Is AAEEF or JEPQ a better dividend investment in 2026?

AAEEF currently yields 68027.21% with a 5% 5-year dividend growth rate. JEPQ yields 11.47% with 5% growth. The better choice depends on your goal: AAEEF offers higher current income.

What is the dividend yield difference between AAEEF and JEPQ?

AAEEF has a forward dividend yield of 68027.21% ($2.00/share annually). JEPQ yields 11.47% ($6.16/share annually). The yield gap is 68015.74 percentage points.

Home › Compare › AAEEF vs JEPQ

AAEEF vs JEPQ: Dividend Comparison 2026

AAEEF yields 68027.21% · JEPQ yields 11.47%● Live data

vsPost on X →

After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled

🏆 AAEEF wins by $1.0327235341438356e+25M in total portfolio value

INVESTMENT

TIME HORIZON10 years

AAEEF

● Live price

68027.21%

Share price

$0.00

Annual div

$2.00

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$1.0327235341438356e+25M

Annual income

$10,297,458,053,316,620,000,000,000,000,000.00

Full AAEEF calculator →

JEPQ

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF

● Live price

11.47%

Share price

$53.77

Annual div

$6.16

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$45.8K

Annual income

$2,269.18

Full JEPQ calculator →

Portfolio growth — AAEEF vs JEPQ

📍 AAEEF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis Period	AAEEF	JEPQ
2008–2009 GFC	— No data	— No data
2020 Q1–Q2 COVID	— No data	— No data
2022 Q4 Rate Hike	— No data	— No data

Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.

📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, AAEEF + JEPQ cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan

—

Feb

—

Mar

—

Apr

—

May

—

Jun

—

Jul

—

Aug

—

Sep

—

Oct

—

Nov

—

Dec

—

AAEEF pays

JEPQ pays

Both pay

Neither

💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

AAEEF

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$5,782,312.93/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$8,752,839,345,319,127,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr

JEPQ

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$974.55/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$1,928.80/yr

At 15% tax rate, AAEEF beats the other by $8,752,839,345,319,127,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000

⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of AAEEF + JEPQ for your $10,000?

AAEEF: 50%JEPQ: 50%

100% JEPQ50/50100% AAEEF

Portfolio after 10yr

$5.163617670719178e+24M

Annual income

$5,148,729,026,658,310,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr

Blended yield

99.71%

🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

AAEEF buys

JEPQ buys

No recent congressional trades found for AAEEF or JEPQ in the last 90 days.

STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →

MetricAAEEFJEPQ

Forward yield	68027.21% ✓	11.47%
Annual dividend / share	$2.00	$6.16 ✓
Payout ratio	50%	50%
1-year div growth	0%	0%
5-year div CAGR	0%	0%
Portfolio after 10y	$1.0327235341438356e+25M	$45.8K ✓
Annual income after 10y	$10,297,458,053,316,620,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓	$2,269.18
Total dividends collected	$1.0325282375986315e+25M	$17.1K ✓
Payment frequency	quarterly	monthly
Sector	Stock	ETF

Year-by-year: AAEEF vs JEPQ ($10,000, DRIP)

Year	AAEEF Portfolio	AAEEF Income/yr	JEPQ Portfolio	JEPQ Income/yr	Gap
1← crossover	$6,813,421	$6,802,721.09	$11,967	$1,146.53	+$6.80M → AAEEF
2	$4,339,047,680	$4,331,757,319.88	$14,216	$1,268.02	+$4339.03M → AAEEF
3	$2,582,800,800,013	$2,578,158,018,994.71	$16,774	$1,392.20	+$2582800.78M → AAEEF
4	$1,437,004,963,850,865	$1,434,241,366,994,851.00	$19,667	$1,518.21	+$1437004963.83M → AAEEF
5	$747,309,164,434,008,400	$745,771,569,122,688,000.00	$22,925	$1,645.21	+$747309164433.99M → AAEEF
6	$363,262,958,250,118,550,000	$362,463,337,444,174,200,000.00	$26,578	$1,772.40	+$363262958250118.56M → AAEEF
7	$165,053,621,590,190,780,000,000	$164,664,930,224,863,160,000,000.00	$30,656	$1,899.04	+$165053621590190784.00M → AAEEF
8	$70,099,804,818,916,640,000,000,000	$69,923,197,443,815,140,000,000,000.00	$35,194	$2,024.45	+$70099804818916646912.00M → AAEEF
9	$27,829,241,235,266,194,000,000,000,000	$27,754,234,444,109,950,000,000,000,000.00	$40,228	$2,148.01	+$2.7829241235266194e+22M → AAEEF
10	$10,327,235,341,438,356,000,000,000,000,000	$10,297,458,053,316,620,000,000,000,000,000.00	$45,796	$2,269.18	+$1.0327235341438356e+25M → AAEEF

AAEEF vs JEPQ: Complete Analysis 2026

AAEEF — Stock

Altair Resources Inc., a mineral exploration company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral resource properties. The company primarily explores for gold and silver deposits. It has rights to acquire a 65% interest in the Simon gold and silver property located in the state of Nevada, the United States; and a 90% interest in the Marbera property with three gold prospects located in the southwest region of Burkina Faso The company was formerly known as Altair Gold Inc. and changed its name to Altair Resources Inc. in June 2016. Altair Resources Inc. was incorporated in 2005 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Full AAEEF Calculator →

JEPQ — ETF

The fund seeks to achieve this objective by (1) creating an actively managed portfolio of equity securities comprised significantly of those included in the fund’s primary benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index (the Benchmark), and (2) through equity-linked notes (ELNs), selling call options with exposure to the Benchmark. It is non-diversified.

Full JEPQ Calculator →

📬

Get this AAEEF vs JEPQ comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

AAEEF vs SCHD AAEEF vs JEPI AAEEF vs O AAEEF vs KO AAEEF vs MAIN AAEEF vs XYLD AAEEF vs QYLD AAEEF vs VYM

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.