Is ABCAF or RYLD a better dividend investment in 2026?

ABCAF currently yields 1876.17% with a 5% 5-year dividend growth rate. RYLD yields 12.39% with 5% growth. The better choice depends on your goal: ABCAF offers higher current income.

What is the dividend yield difference between ABCAF and RYLD?

ABCAF has a forward dividend yield of 1876.17% ($2.00/share annually). RYLD yields 12.39% ($1.81/share annually). The yield gap is 1863.78 percentage points.

Home › Compare › ABCAF vs RYLD

ABCAF vs RYLD: Dividend Comparison 2026

ABCAF yields 1876.17% · RYLD yields 12.39%● Live data

vsPost on X →

After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled

🏆 ABCAF wins by $5488079221.85M in total portfolio value

INVESTMENT

TIME HORIZON10 years

ABCAF

● Live price

1876.17%

Share price

$0.11

Annual div

$2.00

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$5488079221.89M

Annual income

$4,967,265,563,578,671.00

Full ABCAF calculator →

RYLD

● Live price

12.39%

Share price

$14.64

Annual div

$1.81

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$45.3K

Annual income

$2,682.98

Full RYLD calculator →

Portfolio growth — ABCAF vs RYLD

📍 ABCAF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis Period	ABCAF	RYLD
2008–2009 GFC	— No data	— No data
2020 Q1–Q2 COVID	— No data	— No data
2022 Q4 Rate Hike	— No data	— No data

Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.

📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, ABCAF + RYLD cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan

—

Feb

—

Mar

—

Apr

—

May

—

Jun

—

Jul

—

Aug

—

Sep

—

Oct

—

Nov

—

Dec

—

ABCAF pays

RYLD pays

Both pay

Neither

💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

ABCAF

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$159,474.67/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$4,222,175,729,041,870.00/yr

RYLD

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$1,053.44/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$2,280.53/yr

At 15% tax rate, ABCAF beats the other by $4,222,175,729,039,589.50/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000

⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of ABCAF + RYLD for your $10,000?

ABCAF: 50%RYLD: 50%

100% RYLD50/50100% ABCAF

Portfolio after 10yr

$2744039610.97M

Annual income

$2,483,632,781,790,677.00/yr

Blended yield

90.51%

🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

ABCAF buys

RYLD buys

No recent congressional trades found for ABCAF or RYLD in the last 90 days.

STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →

MetricABCAFRYLD

Forward yield	1876.17% ✓	12.39%
Annual dividend / share	$2.00 ✓	$1.81
Payout ratio	50%	50%
1-year div growth	0%	0%
5-year div CAGR	0%	0%
Portfolio after 10y	$5488079221.89M ✓	$45.3K
Annual income after 10y	$4,967,265,563,578,671.00 ✓	$2,682.98
Total dividends collected	$5450925032.84M ✓	$19.4K
Payment frequency	quarterly	quarterly
Sector	Stock	ETF

Year-by-year: ABCAF vs RYLD ($10,000, DRIP)

Year	ABCAF Portfolio	ABCAF Income/yr	RYLD Portfolio	RYLD Income/yr	Gap
1← crossover	$198,317	$187,617.26	$11,939	$1,239.34	+$186.4K → ABCAF
2	$3,689,558	$3,477,358.99	$14,158	$1,382.89	+$3.68M → ABCAF
3	$64,409,427	$60,461,599.47	$16,682	$1,532.59	+$64.39M → ABCAF
4	$1,055,358,585	$986,440,497.83	$19,537	$1,687.64	+$1055.34M → ABCAF
5	$16,234,824,892	$15,105,591,206.38	$22,752	$1,847.20	+$16234.80M → ABCAF
6	$234,542,102,679	$217,170,840,044.70	$26,355	$2,010.43	+$234542.08M → ABCAF
7	$3,183,142,156,393	$2,932,182,106,526.59	$30,376	$2,176.45	+$3183142.13M → ABCAF
8	$40,597,349,654,731	$37,191,387,547,390.53	$34,847	$2,344.43	+$40597349.62M → ABCAF
9	$486,741,736,743,396	$443,302,572,612,832.90	$39,800	$2,513.54	+$486741736.70M → ABCAF
10	$5,488,079,221,894,105	$4,967,265,563,578,671.00	$45,269	$2,682.98	+$5488079221.85M → ABCAF

ABCAF vs RYLD: Complete Analysis 2026

ABCAF — Stock

Athabasca Minerals Inc. develops and supplies aggregates and industrial minerals in Canada. The company operates through four segments: AMI Aggregates, AMI Silica, AMI RockChain, and TerraShift. It holds interest in the Richardson Quarry project comprising three metallic and industrial mineral leases covering an area of 3,904 hectares located to the north of Fort McMurray region. The company also holds interests in the Montney In-Basin project situated in the vicinity of Dawson Creek, Alberta and Fort St. John, British Columbia; the Duvernay project located in Alberta; and Firebag silica sand deposit located north of Fort McMurray, Alberta. In addition, it constructs, operates, and manages the Coffey Lake Public Pit located in north of Fort McMurray, Alberta. Further, it operates RockChain, a digital platform to provide integrated supply and transportation solutions industrial and construction markets; and offers engineering and project services, as well as proprietary technology applications, such as TerraMaps. The company serves multi-national companies, governmental bodies, and small and private companies in infrastructure, construction, power generation, aggregates, forestry, and energy sectors. The company was incorporated in 2006 and is headquartered in Edmonton, Canada.

Full ABCAF Calculator →

RYLD — ETF

The Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index.

Full RYLD Calculator →

📬

Get this ABCAF vs RYLD comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

ABCAF vs SCHD ABCAF vs JEPI ABCAF vs O ABCAF vs KO ABCAF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.