HomeCompareAPHLF vs KMB

APHLF vs KMB: Dividend Comparison 2026

APHLF yields 181.11% · KMB yields 5.25%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 APHLF wins by $67.98M in total portfolio value
10 years
APHLF
APHLF
● Live price
181.11%
Share price
$1.10
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$68.02M
Annual income
$32,606,406.54
Full APHLF calculator →
KMB
KMB
● Live price
5.25%
Share price
$96.35
Annual div
$5.06
5Y div CAGR
17%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$45.9K
Annual income
$5,222.34
Full KMB calculator →

Portfolio growth — APHLF vs KMB

📍 APHLF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodAPHLFKMB
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, APHLF + KMB cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
APHLF pays
KMB pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

APHLF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$15,394.37/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$27,715,445.56/yr
KMB
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$446.39/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,438.99/yr
At 15% tax rate, APHLF beats the other by $27,711,006.57/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of APHLF + KMB for your $10,000?

APHLF: 50%KMB: 50%
100% KMB50/50100% APHLF
Portfolio after 10yr
$34.03M
Annual income
$16,305,814.44/yr
Blended yield
47.91%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on KMB right now

APHLF
No analyst data
Altman Z
14.1
Piotroski
1/9
KMB
Analyst Ratings
9
Buy
19
Hold
3
Sell
Consensus: Hold
Price Target
$123.00
+27.7% upside vs current
Range: $102.00 — $162.00
Altman Z
3.4
Piotroski
7/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

APHLF buys
0
KMB buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for APHLF or KMB in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricAPHLFKMB
Forward yield181.11%5.25%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$5.06
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%17%
Portfolio after 10y$68.02M$45.9K
Annual income after 10y$32,606,406.54$5,222.34
Total dividends collected$63.74M$21.6K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockConsumer Staples

Year-by-year: APHLF vs KMB ($10,000, DRIP)

YearAPHLF PortfolioAPHLF Income/yrKMB PortfolioKMB Income/yrGap
1← crossover$28,811$18,111.02$11,314$614.45+$17.5KAPHLF
2$79,594$48,766.07$12,867$760.19+$66.7KAPHLF
3$211,074$125,908.48$14,713$945.27+$196.4KAPHLF
4$537,900$312,051.41$16,924$1,181.90+$521.0KAPHLF
5$1,318,760$743,206.94$19,596$1,486.64+$1.30MAPHLF
6$3,113,977$1,702,903.17$22,850$1,882.16+$3.09MAPHLF
7$7,089,945$3,757,990.18$26,849$2,399.80+$7.06MAPHLF
8$15,582,731$7,996,489.52$31,812$3,083.36+$15.55MAPHLF
9$33,098,935$16,425,412.29$38,033$3,994.72+$33.06MAPHLF
10$68,022,267$32,606,406.54$45,918$5,222.34+$67.98MAPHLF

APHLF vs KMB: Complete Analysis 2026

APHLFStock

Alpha Lithium Corporation engages in the acquisition and development of lithium brine deposits in North America and Argentina. It holds 100% interests in the Tolillar Salar project comprising 10 exploitation concessions totaling 27,500 hectares located in the province of Salta, Argentina; the Green Energy lithium brine project covering an area of 4160 acres located in Grand County, Utah; and the Hombre Muerto project that covers an area of 5,000 hectares situated in Argentina. The company was formerly known as Voltaic Minerals Corp. and changed its name to Alpha Lithium Corporation in July 2019. Alpha Lithium Corporation was incorporated in 2009 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Full APHLF Calculator →

KMBConsumer Staples

Kimberly-Clark Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and markets personal care and consumer tissue products worldwide. It operates through three segments: Personal Care, Consumer Tissue, and K-C Professional. The Personal Care segment offers disposable diapers, swimpants, training and youth pants, baby wipes, feminine and incontinence care products, and other related products under the Huggies, Pull-Ups, Little Swimmers, GoodNites, DryNites, Sweety, Kotex, U by Kotex, Intimus, Depend, Plenitud, Softex, Poise, and other brand names. The Consumer Tissue segment provides facial and bathroom tissues, paper towels, napkins, and related products under the Kleenex, Scott, Cottonelle, Viva, Andrex, Scottex, Neve, and other brand names. The K-C Professional segment offers wipers, tissues, towels, apparel, soaps, and sanitizers under the Kleenex, Scott, WypAll, Kimtech, and KleenGuard brands. The company sells household use products directly to supermarkets, mass merchandisers, drugstores, warehouse clubs, variety and department stores, and other retail outlets, as well as through other distributors and e-commerce; and away-from-home use products directly to manufacturing, lodging, office building, food service, and public facilities, as well as through distributors and e-commerce. Kimberly-Clark Corporation was founded in 1872 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Full KMB Calculator →
📬

Get this APHLF vs KMB comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

APHLF vs SCHDAPHLF vs JEPIAPHLF vs OAPHLF vs KOAPHLF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.