HomeCompareASHS vs NOBL

ASHS vs NOBL: Dividend Comparison 2026

ASHS yields 0.47% · NOBL yields 2.17%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 NOBL wins by $2.5K in total portfolio value
10 years
ASHS
ASHS
● Live price
0.47%
Share price
$40.37
Annual div
$0.19
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$20.3K
Annual income
$48.72
Full ASHS calculator →
NOBL
NOBL
● Live price
2.17%
Share price
$104.67
Annual div
$2.27
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$22.9K
Annual income
$249.78
Full NOBL calculator →

Portfolio growth — ASHS vs NOBL

📍 NOBL pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodASHSNOBL
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, ASHS + NOBL cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
ASHS pays
NOBL pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

ASHS
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$40.16/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$41.41/yr
NOBL
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$184.52/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$212.31/yr
At 15% tax rate, NOBL beats the other by $170.90/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of ASHS + NOBL for your $10,000?

ASHS: 50%NOBL: 50%
100% NOBL50/50100% ASHS
Portfolio after 10yr
$21.6K
Annual income
$149.25/yr
Blended yield
0.69%
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

ASHS buys
0
NOBL buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for ASHS or NOBL in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricASHSNOBL
Forward yield0.47%2.17%
Annual dividend / share$0.19$2.27
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%0%
Portfolio after 10y$20.3K$22.9K
Annual income after 10y$48.72$249.78
Total dividends collected$480.00$2.3K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockETF

Year-by-year: ASHS vs NOBL ($10,000, DRIP)

YearASHS PortfolioASHS Income/yrNOBL PortfolioNOBL Income/yrGap
1← crossover$10,747$47.24$10,917$217.08$170.00NOBL
2$11,547$47.45$11,903$221.48$356.00NOBL
3$12,403$47.65$12,962$225.68$559.00NOBL
4$13,319$47.83$14,099$229.68$780.00NOBL
5$14,299$48.00$15,319$233.49$1.0KNOBL
6$15,348$48.16$16,628$237.10$1.3KNOBL
7$16,471$48.32$18,033$240.53$1.6KNOBL
8$17,673$48.46$19,539$243.78$1.9KNOBL
9$18,958$48.59$21,154$246.86$2.2KNOBL
10$20,334$48.72$22,884$249.78$2.5KNOBL

ASHS vs NOBL: Complete Analysis 2026

ASHSStock

The Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (the “Fund”) seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before fees and expenses, of the CSI 500 Index (the “Underlying Index”).

Full ASHS Calculator →

NOBLETF

The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities of the index. The index contains a minimum of 40 stocks, which are equally weighted, and no single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index weight. It seeks to remain fully invested at all times in securities and/or financial instruments that, in combination, provide exposure to the returns of the index without regard to market conditions, trends or direction.

Full NOBL Calculator →
📬

Get this ASHS vs NOBL comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

ASHS vs SCHDASHS vs JEPIASHS vs OASHS vs KOASHS vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.