HomeCompareAXPW vs SBUX

AXPW vs SBUX: Dividend Comparison 2026

AXPW yields 666.67% · SBUX yields 2.75%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 AXPW wins by $608115.50M in total portfolio value
10 years
AXPW
AXPW
● Live price
666.67%
Share price
$0.30
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$608115.66M
Annual income
$469,561,018,816.25
Full AXPW calculator →
SBUX
SBUX
● Live price
2.75%
Share price
$89.59
Annual div
$2.46
5Y div CAGR
48.3%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$157.5K
Annual income
$65,840.13
Full SBUX calculator →

Portfolio growth — AXPW vs SBUX

📍 AXPW pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodAXPWSBUX
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, AXPW + SBUX cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
AXPW pays
SBUX pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

AXPW
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$56,666.67/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$399,126,865,993.81/yr
SBUX
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$233.40/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$55,964.11/yr
At 15% tax rate, AXPW beats the other by $399,126,810,029.70/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of AXPW + SBUX for your $10,000?

AXPW: 50%SBUX: 50%
100% SBUX50/50100% AXPW
Portfolio after 10yr
$304057.91M
Annual income
$234,780,542,328.18/yr
Blended yield
77.22%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on SBUX right now

AXPW
No analyst data
SBUX
Analyst Ratings
28
Buy
27
Hold
3
Sell
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$104.00
+16.1% upside vs current
Range: $90.00 — $120.00
Altman Z
2.6
Piotroski
5/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

AXPW buys
0
SBUX buys
6
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
Shelley Moore Capito🏛 Senate$SBUX▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-28
Shelley Moore Capito🏛 Senate$SBUX▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-28
Sheldon Whitehouse🏛 Senate$SBUX▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-09
Sheldon Whitehouse🏛 Senate$SBUX▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-09
Sheldon Whitehouse🏛 Senate$SBUX▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-09
Sheldon Whitehouse🏛 Senate$SBUX▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-09
Dan Newhouse🏢 House$SBUX▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002025-12-11
Ro Khanna🏢 House$SBUX▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002025-10-07
Ro Khanna🏢 House$SBUX▲ Buy$15,001 - $50,0002025-09-29
Ro Khanna🏢 House$SBUX▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002025-08-26
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricAXPWSBUX
Forward yield666.67%2.75%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$2.46
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%48.3%
Portfolio after 10y$608115.66M$157.5K
Annual income after 10y$469,561,018,816.25$65,840.13
Total dividends collected$596792.85M$127.5K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockConsumer Discretionary

Year-by-year: AXPW vs SBUX ($10,000, DRIP)

YearAXPW PortfolioAXPW Income/yrSBUX PortfolioSBUX Income/yrGap
1← crossover$77,367$66,666.67$11,107$407.21+$66.3KAXPW
2$564,818$482,035.31$12,512$626.87+$552.3KAXPW
3$3,893,246$3,288,890.67$14,366$978.69+$3.88MAXPW
4$25,352,760$21,186,987.16$16,929$1,557.50+$25.34MAXPW
5$156,070,781$128,943,327.59$20,658$2,543.80+$156.05MAXPW
6$908,837,800$741,842,064.29$26,406$4,302.22+$908.81MAXPW
7$5,009,769,782$4,037,313,336.56$35,877$7,622.00+$5009.73MAXPW
8$26,159,339,258$20,798,885,591.56$52,741$14,352.64+$26159.29MAXPW
9$129,490,317,125$101,499,824,118.87$85,676$29,243.03+$129490.23MAXPW
10$608,115,658,140$469,561,018,816.25$157,513$65,840.13+$608115.50MAXPW

AXPW vs SBUX: Complete Analysis 2026

AXPWStock

Axion Power International, Inc. was an energy solutions company specializing in the development and manufacturing of advanced lead-carbon (PbC) batteries. These batteries were designed for various applications, including energy storage systems, renewable energy integration, off-grid solutions, and automotive uses. The company’s PbC technology combined the benefits of lead-acid and supercapacitor technologies, aiming to offer improved performance and longevity over traditional batteries.

Full AXPW Calculator →

SBUXConsumer Discretionary

Starbucks Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a roaster, marketer, and retailer of specialty coffee worldwide. The company operates through three segments: North America, International, and Channel Development. Its stores offer coffee and tea beverages, roasted whole beans and ground coffees, single serve products, and ready-to-drink beverages; and various food products, such as pastries, breakfast sandwiches, and lunch items. The company also licenses its trademarks through licensed stores, and grocery and foodservice accounts. The company offers its products under the Starbucks, Teavana, Seattle's Best Coffee, Evolution Fresh, Ethos, Starbucks Reserve, and Princi brands. As of October 3, 2021, it operated 16,826 company-operated and licensed stores in North America; and 17,007 company-operated and licensed stores internationally. The company was founded in 1971 and is based in Seattle, Washington.

Full SBUX Calculator →
📬

Get this AXPW vs SBUX comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

AXPW vs SCHDAXPW vs JEPIAXPW vs OAXPW vs KOAXPW vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.