Is BVTEF or NOBL a better dividend investment in 2026?

BVTEF currently yields 9389.67% with a 5% 5-year dividend growth rate. NOBL yields 2.17% with 5% growth. The better choice depends on your goal: BVTEF offers higher current income.

What is the dividend yield difference between BVTEF and NOBL?

BVTEF has a forward dividend yield of 9389.67% ($2.00/share annually). NOBL yields 2.17% ($2.27/share annually). The yield gap is 9387.50 percentage points.

Home › Compare › BVTEF vs NOBL

BVTEF vs NOBL: Dividend Comparison 2026

BVTEF yields 9389.67% · NOBL yields 2.17%● Live data

vsPost on X →

After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled

🏆 BVTEF wins by $29652364190233612.00M in total portfolio value

INVESTMENT

TIME HORIZON10 years

BVTEF

● Live price

9389.67%

Share price

$0.02

Annual div

$2.00

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$29652364190233612.00M

Annual income

$29,043,889,991,112,714,000,000.00

Full BVTEF calculator →

NOBL

● Live price

2.17%

Share price

$104.67

Annual div

$2.27

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$22.9K

Annual income

$249.78

Full NOBL calculator →

Portfolio growth — BVTEF vs NOBL

📍 BVTEF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis Period	BVTEF	NOBL
2008–2009 GFC	— No data	— No data
2020 Q1–Q2 COVID	— No data	— No data
2022 Q4 Rate Hike	— No data	— No data

Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.

📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, BVTEF + NOBL cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan

—

Feb

—

Mar

—

Apr

—

May

—

Jun

—

Jul

—

Aug

—

Sep

—

Oct

—

Nov

—

Dec

—

BVTEF pays

NOBL pays

Both pay

Neither

💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

BVTEF

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$798,122.07/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$24,687,306,492,445,807,000,000.00/yr

NOBL

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$184.52/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$212.31/yr

At 15% tax rate, BVTEF beats the other by $24,687,306,492,445,807,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000

⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of BVTEF + NOBL for your $10,000?

BVTEF: 50%NOBL: 50%

100% NOBL50/50100% BVTEF

Portfolio after 10yr

$14826182095116806.00M

Annual income

$14,521,944,995,556,357,000,000.00/yr

Blended yield

97.95%

🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

BVTEF buys

NOBL buys

No recent congressional trades found for BVTEF or NOBL in the last 90 days.

STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →

MetricBVTEFNOBL

Forward yield	9389.67% ✓	2.17%
Annual dividend / share	$2.00	$2.27 ✓
Payout ratio	50%	50%
1-year div growth	0%	0%
5-year div CAGR	0%	0%
Portfolio after 10y	$29652364190233612.00M ✓	$22.9K
Annual income after 10y	$29,043,889,991,112,714,000,000.00 ✓	$249.78
Total dividends collected	$29611830854875112.00M ✓	$2.3K
Payment frequency	quarterly	quarterly
Sector	Stock	ETF

Year-by-year: BVTEF vs NOBL ($10,000, DRIP)

Year	BVTEF Portfolio	BVTEF Income/yr	NOBL Portfolio	NOBL Income/yr	Gap
1← crossover	$949,667	$938,967.14	$10,917	$217.08	+$938.8K → BVTEF
2	$84,353,175	$83,337,030.95	$11,903	$221.48	+$84.34M → BVTEF
3	$7,008,317,024	$6,918,059,127.47	$12,962	$225.68	+$7008.30M → BVTEF
4	$544,670,195,710	$537,171,296,494.19	$14,099	$229.68	+$544670.18M → BVTEF
5	$39,599,349,640,156	$39,016,552,530,745.70	$15,319	$233.49	+$39599349.62M → BVTEF
6	$2,693,431,305,051,366	$2,651,060,000,936,399.50	$16,628	$237.10	+$2693431305.03M → BVTEF
7	$171,402,817,083,723,070	$168,520,845,587,318,100.00	$18,033	$240.53	+$171402817083.71M → BVTEF
8	$10,206,035,765,188,530,000	$10,022,634,750,908,946,000.00	$19,539	$243.78	+$10206035765188.51M → BVTEF
9	$568,667,475,813,928,340,000	$557,747,017,545,176,500,000.00	$21,154	$246.86	+$568667475813928.38M → BVTEF
10	$29,652,364,190,233,613,000,000	$29,043,889,991,112,714,000,000.00	$22,884	$249.78	+$29652364190233612.00M → BVTEF

BVTEF vs NOBL: Complete Analysis 2026

BVTEF — Stock

Iconic Minerals Ltd., a mineral exploration company, engages in the acquisition and exploration of gold and lithium properties in Nevada and Canada. The company holds a 100% interest in the Hercules project located in Lyon County; and 50% interests in the New Pass project located in Churchill County and Squaw creek property located to the north of Battle Mountain in Nevada. It also holds a 100% interest in the Bonnie Claire property with 1,155 claims covering 13,900 acres located in Nevada; and holds an option to acquire a 100% interest in Smith Creek property located in Nevada. The company was formerly known as Bonaventure Enterprises Inc. and changed its name to Iconic Minerals Ltd. in March 2011. Iconic Minerals Ltd. was incorporated in 1979 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Full BVTEF Calculator →

NOBL — ETF

The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities of the index. The index contains a minimum of 40 stocks, which are equally weighted, and no single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index weight. It seeks to remain fully invested at all times in securities and/or financial instruments that, in combination, provide exposure to the returns of the index without regard to market conditions, trends or direction.

Full NOBL Calculator →

📬

Get this BVTEF vs NOBL comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

BVTEF vs SCHD BVTEF vs JEPI BVTEF vs O BVTEF vs KO BVTEF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.