HomeCompareCA vs SCHD

CA vs SCHD: Dividend Comparison 2026

CA yields 3.21% · SCHD yields 3.46%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 SCHD wins by $4.4K in total portfolio value
10 years
CA
CA
● Live price
3.21%
Share price
$24.78
Annual div
$0.79
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$24.6K
Annual income
$394.17
Full CA calculator →
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
● Live price
3.46%
Share price
$30.48
Annual div
$1.06
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$29.0K
Annual income
$425.95
Full SCHD calculator →

Portfolio growth — CA vs SCHD

📍 SCHD pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodCASCHD
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, CA + SCHD cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
CA pays
SCHD pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

CA
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$272.55/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$335.04/yr
SCHD
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$294.40/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$362.06/yr
At 15% tax rate, SCHD beats the other by $27.01/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of CA + SCHD for your $10,000?

CA: 50%SCHD: 50%
100% SCHD50/50100% CA
Portfolio after 10yr
$26.8K
Annual income
$410.05/yr
Blended yield
1.53%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is split right now

CA
Analyst Ratings
4
Hold
Consensus: Hold
Altman Z
2.9
Piotroski
7/9
SCHD
No analyst data
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

CA buys
0
SCHD buys
0
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
Josh Gottheimer🏢 House$CA▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002018-11-05
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricCASCHD
Forward yield3.21%3.46%
Annual dividend / share$0.79$1.06
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%0%
Portfolio after 10y$24.6K$29.0K
Annual income after 10y$394.17$425.95
Total dividends collected$3.6K$3.9K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockETF

Year-by-year: CA vs SCHD ($10,000, DRIP)

YearCA PortfolioCA Income/yrSCHD PortfolioSCHD Income/yrGap
1← crossover$11,021$320.64$11,226$346.36$205.00SCHD
2$12,122$330.25$12,572$357.38$450.00SCHD
3$13,310$339.50$14,046$367.84$736.00SCHD
4$14,591$348.39$15,660$377.73$1.1KSCHD
5$15,969$356.91$17,425$387.07$1.5KSCHD
6$17,452$365.07$19,354$395.86$1.9KSCHD
7$19,046$372.87$21,461$404.13$2.4KSCHD
8$20,760$380.31$23,762$411.89$3.0KSCHD
9$22,600$387.41$26,272$419.15$3.7KSCHD
10$24,576$394.17$29,010$425.95$4.4KSCHD

CA vs SCHD: Complete Analysis 2026

CAStock

Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (the “fund”) seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before fees and expenses, of the ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index (the “Underlying Index”).

Full CA Calculator →

SCHDETF

The fund’s goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index.

Full SCHD Calculator →
📬

Get this CA vs SCHD comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

CA vs JEPICA vs OCA vs KOCA vs MAINCA vs VYMCA vs DGROCA vs VIGCA vs HDV

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.