HomeCompareCBAOF vs PLD

CBAOF vs PLD: Dividend Comparison 2026

CBAOF yields 4.82% · PLD yields 3.10%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 PLD wins by $5.88M in total portfolio value
10 years
CBAOF
CBAOF
● Live price
4.82%
Share price
$1.94
Annual div
$0.09
5Y div CAGR
1.3%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$28.0K
Annual income
$760.10
Full CBAOF calculator →
PLD
PLD
● Live price
3.10%
Share price
$132.18
Annual div
$4.10
5Y div CAGR
74.4%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$5.91M
Annual income
$4,750,725.19
Full PLD calculator →

Portfolio growth — CBAOF vs PLD

📍 PLD pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodCBAOFPLD
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, CBAOF + PLD cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
CBAOF pays
PLD pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

CBAOF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$409.47/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$646.09/yr
PLD
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$263.66/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,038,116.41/yr
At 15% tax rate, PLD beats the other by $4,037,470.33/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of CBAOF + PLD for your $10,000?

CBAOF: 50%PLD: 50%
100% PLD50/50100% CBAOF
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.97M
Annual income
$2,375,742.64/yr
Blended yield
80.04%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on PLD right now

CBAOF
No analyst data
Altman Z
1.5
Piotroski
7/9
PLD
Analyst Ratings
25
Buy
16
Hold
1
Sell
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$136.00
+2.9% upside vs current
Range: $119.00 — $155.00
Altman Z
1.9
Piotroski
5/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

CBAOF buys
0
PLD buys
13
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-02-26
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-29
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-16
Ro Khanna🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-26
Dan Newhouse🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-18
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-14
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-07
Shelley Moore Capito🏛 Senate$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-01
Shelley Moore Capito🏛 Senate$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-01
Thomas H. Kean🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-06-30
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricCBAOFPLD
Forward yield4.82%3.10%
Annual dividend / share$0.09$4.10
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR1.3%74.4%
Portfolio after 10y$28.0K$5.91M
Annual income after 10y$760.10$4,750,725.19
Total dividends collected$6.2K$5.78M
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockREIT

Year-by-year: CBAOF vs PLD ($10,000, DRIP)

YearCBAOF PortfolioCBAOF Income/yrPLD PortfolioPLD Income/yrGap
1← crossover$11,188$487.99$11,241$540.96$53.00PLD
2$12,488$516.88$13,019$991.13$531.00PLD
3$13,908$546.20$15,801$1,870.97$1.9KPLD
4$15,458$575.92$20,609$3,701.21$5.2KPLD
5$17,146$605.99$29,919$7,867.97$12.8KPLD
6$18,983$636.35$50,631$18,617.74$31.6KPLD
7$20,978$666.99$105,528$51,352.20$84.5KPLD
8$23,145$697.85$287,364$174,449.42$264.2KPLD
9$25,494$728.89$1,081,760$774,280.77$1.06MPLD
10$28,038$760.10$5,908,209$4,750,725.19$5.88MPLD

CBAOF vs PLD: Complete Analysis 2026

CBAOFStock

Terrafina (BMV:TERRA13) is a Mexican real estate investment trust formed primarily to acquire, develop, lease and manage industrial real estate properties in Mexico. Terrafina's portfolio consists of attractive, strategically located warehouses and other light manufacturing properties throughout the Central, Bajio and Northern regions of Mexico. It is internally managed by highly-qualified industry specialists and externally advised by PGIM Real Estate. Terrafina owns 300 real estate properties, including 289 developed industrial facilities with a collective GLA of approximately 42.3 million square feet and 11 land reserve parcels, designed to preserve the organic growth capability of the portfolio. Terrafina's objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted returns for the holders of its certificates through stable distributions and capital appreciations. Terrafina aims to achieve this objective through a successful performance of its industrial real estate and complementary properties, strategic acquisitions, access to a high level of institutional support, and an effective management and corporate governance structure.

Full CBAOF Calculator →

PLDREIT

Prologis, Inc. is the global leader in logistics real estate with a focus on high-barrier, high-growth markets. As of December 31, 2020, the company owned or had investments in, on a wholly owned basis or through co-investment ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately 984 million square feet (91 million square meters) in 19 countries. Prologis leases modern logistics facilities to a diverse base of approximately 5,500 customers principally across two major categories: business-to-business and retail/online fulfillment.

Full PLD Calculator →
📬

Get this CBAOF vs PLD comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

CBAOF vs SCHDCBAOF vs JEPICBAOF vs OCBAOF vs KOCBAOF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.