HomeCompareCCGDF vs QSR

CCGDF vs QSR: Dividend Comparison 2026

CCGDF yields 2.49% · QSR yields 3.40%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 QSR wins by $4.6K in total portfolio value
10 years
CCGDF
CCGDF
● Live price
2.49%
Share price
$0.13
Annual div
$0.00
5Y div CAGR
-50%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$20.1K
Annual income
$0.25
Full CCGDF calculator →
QSR
QSR
● Live price
3.40%
Share price
$73.76
Annual div
$2.51
5Y div CAGR
-0.8%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$24.7K
Annual income
$387.88
Full QSR calculator →

Portfolio growth — CCGDF vs QSR

📍 QSR pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodCCGDFQSR
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, CCGDF + QSR cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
CCGDF pays
QSR pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

CCGDF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$211.84/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$0.21/yr
QSR
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$289.25/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$329.70/yr
At 15% tax rate, QSR beats the other by $329.49/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of CCGDF + QSR for your $10,000?

CCGDF: 50%QSR: 50%
100% QSR50/50100% CCGDF
Portfolio after 10yr
$22.4K
Annual income
$194.06/yr
Blended yield
0.87%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on QSR right now

CCGDF
No analyst data
Altman Z
0.1
Piotroski
5/9
QSR
Analyst Ratings
27
Buy
15
Hold
2
Sell
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$81.57
+10.6% upside vs current
Range: $71.00 — $90.00
Altman Z
1.4
Piotroski
7/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

CCGDF buys
0
QSR buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for CCGDF or QSR in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricCCGDFQSR
Forward yield2.49%3.40%
Annual dividend / share$0.00$2.51
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR-50%-0.8%
Portfolio after 10y$20.1K$24.7K
Annual income after 10y$0.25$387.88
Total dividends collected$251.00$3.7K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockStock

Year-by-year: CCGDF vs QSR ($10,000, DRIP)

YearCCGDF PortfolioCCGDF Income/yrQSR PortfolioQSR Income/yrGap
1← crossover$10,825$124.61$11,038$337.57$213.00QSR
2$11,645$63.03$12,156$345.43$511.00QSR
3$12,492$31.69$13,359$352.69$867.00QSR
4$13,383$15.88$14,654$359.36$1.3KQSR
5$14,327$7.95$16,045$365.45$1.7KQSR
6$15,334$3.98$17,539$370.97$2.2KQSR
7$16,410$1.99$19,143$375.96$2.7KQSR
8$17,559$0.99$20,863$380.42$3.3KQSR
9$18,789$0.50$22,708$384.39$3.9KQSR
10$20,104$0.25$24,685$387.88$4.6KQSR

CCGDF vs QSR: Complete Analysis 2026

CCGDFStock

China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. acquires, manages, invests in, and disposes financial and non-financial institution distressed assets in the People's Republic of China. The company operates through Distressed Asset Management Business, and Financial Services Business segments. It is also involved in receivership; foreign investment; securities and futures dealing; financial bond issuance; inter-bank borrowing and lending; commercial financing for other financial institutions; approved asset securitization business; financial institutions custody; and closing and liquidation of business. In addition, the company engages in consulting and advisory business on finance, investment, and legal and risk management; asset and project evaluation; banking business; fund management; asset management; trust; financial leasing services; and real estate and industrial investments and other businesses. Further, it is involved in securities brokerage, real estate development, property leasing, hotel management, and aircraft leasing activities. The company serves customers through 33 branches. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

Full CCGDF Calculator →

QSRStock

Restaurant Brands International Inc. operates as quick service restaurant company in Canada and internationally. It operates through four segments: Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK), Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (PLK), and Firehouse Subs (FHS). The company owns and franchises TH chain of donut/coffee/tea restaurants that offer blend coffee, tea, and espresso-based hot and cold specialty drinks; and fresh baked goods, including donuts, Timbits, bagels, muffins, cookies and pastries, grilled paninis, classic sandwiches, wraps, soups, and others. It is also involved in owning and franchising BK, a fast food hamburger restaurant chain, which offers flame-grilled hamburgers, chicken and other specialty sandwiches, french fries, soft drinks, and other food items; and PLK quick service restaurants that provide Louisiana style fried chicken, chicken tenders, fried shrimp and other seafood, red beans and rice, and other regional items. In addition, the company owns and franchises FHS restaurants quick service restaurants that offer subs, soft drinks, and local specialties. As of February 15, 2022, the company had approximately 29,000 restaurants in 100 countries under the Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes, And Firehouse Subs brands. Restaurant Brands International Inc. was founded in 1954 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Full QSR Calculator →
📬

Get this CCGDF vs QSR comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

CCGDF vs SCHDCCGDF vs JEPICCGDF vs OCCGDF vs KOCCGDF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.