Home › Compare › CNMXF vs EQR

CNMXF vs EQR: Dividend Comparison 2026

CNMXF yields 2000000.00% · EQR yields 5.87%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 CNMXF wins by $4.879226400974806e+39M in total portfolio value
10 years
CNMXF
CNMXF
● Live price
2000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.879226400974806e+39M
Annual income
$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full CNMXF calculator →
EQR
EQR
● Live price
5.87%
Share price
$59.15
Annual div
$3.47
5Y div CAGR
15.8%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$47.8K
Annual income
$5,475.61
Full EQR calculator →

Portfolio growth — CNMXF vs EQR

📍 CNMXF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodCNMXFEQR
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, CNMXF + EQR cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan
—
Feb
—
Mar
—
Apr
—
May
—
Jun
—
Jul
—
Aug
—
Sep
—
Oct
—
Nov
—
Dec
—
CNMXF pays
EQR pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

CNMXF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$170,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
EQR
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$499.01/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,654.27/yr
At 15% tax rate, CNMXF beats the other by $4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of CNMXF + EQR for your $10,000?

CNMXF: 50%EQR: 50%
100% EQR50/50100% CNMXF
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.439613200487403e+39M
Annual income
$2,439,373,269,665,485,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
99.99%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on EQR right now

CNMXF
No analyst data
Altman Z
-4.4
Piotroski
2/9
EQR
Analyst Ratings
16
Buy
28
Hold
2
Sell
Consensus: Hold
Price Target
$70.35
+18.9% upside vs current
Range: $63.00 — $78.50
Altman Z
1.8
Piotroski
7/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

CNMXF buys
0
EQR buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for CNMXF or EQR in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricCNMXFEQR
Forward yield2000000.00% ✓5.87%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$3.47 ✓
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%15.8% ✓
Portfolio after 10y$4.879226400974806e+39M$47.8K ✓
Annual income after 10y$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓$5,475.61
Total dividends collected$4.879195005460081e+39M$23.0K ✓
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockREIT

Year-by-year: CNMXF vs EQR ($10,000, DRIP)

YearCNMXF PortfolioCNMXF Income/yrEQR PortfolioEQR Income/yrGap
1← crossover$200,010,700$200,000,000.00$11,380$679.82+$200.00M → CNMXF
2$3,738,731,768,458$3,738,517,757,009.35$13,014$837.25+$3738731.76M → CNMXF
3$65,315,062,866,930,490$65,311,062,423,938,240.00$14,961$1,036.20+$65315062866.92M → CNMXF
4$1,066,400,830,062,625,000,000$1,066,330,942,945,357,500,000.00$17,297$1,289.22+$1066400830062625.00M → CNMXF
5$16,272,182,796,453,826,000,000,000$16,271,041,747,565,660,000,000,000.00$20,121$1,613.15+$16272182796453826560.00M → CNMXF
6$232,054,240,113,661,900,000,000,000,000$232,036,828,878,069,680,000,000,000,000.00$23,561$2,030.84+$2.3205424011366188e+23M → CNMXF
7$3,092,799,066,104,688,500,000,000,000,000,000$3,092,550,768,067,767,400,000,000,000,000,000.00$27,783$2,573.54+$3.0927990661046884e+27M → CNMXF
8$38,524,105,697,352,694,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$38,520,796,402,351,967,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$33,013$3,284.39+$3.8524105697352695e+31M → CNMXF
9$448,468,826,014,798,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$448,427,605,221,702,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$39,547$4,223.51+$4.484688260147987e+35M → CNMXF
10$4,879,226,400,974,806,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$47,791$5,475.61+$4.879226400974806e+39M → CNMXF

CNMXF vs EQR: Complete Analysis 2026

CNMXF — Stock

Canamex Gold Corp. engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mining properties. Its flagship property is the Bruner gold project, which comprises 179 unpatented and 27 patented mining claims covering a total of approximately 3,520 acres located in central Nevada, the United States. The company was formerly known as Canamex Resources Corp. and changed its name to Canamex Gold Corp. in November 2017. Canamex Gold Corp. was incorporated in 1987 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Full CNMXF Calculator →

EQR — REIT

Equity Residential is committed to creating communities where people thrive. The Company, a member of the S&P 500, is focused on the acquisition, development and management of residential properties located in and around dynamic cities that attract high quality long-term renters. Equity Residential owns or has investments in 305 properties consisting of 78,568 apartment units, located in Boston, New York, Washington, D.C., Seattle, San Francisco, Southern California and Denver.

Full EQR Calculator →
📬

Get this CNMXF vs EQR comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

CNMXF vs SCHDCNMXF vs JEPICNMXF vs OCNMXF vs KOCNMXF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.