HomeCompareCSRLF vs SBUX

CSRLF vs SBUX: Dividend Comparison 2026

CSRLF yields 4.00% · SBUX yields 2.75%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 SBUX wins by $134.0K in total portfolio value
10 years
CSRLF
CSRLF
● Live price
4.00%
Share price
$5.75
Annual div
$0.23
5Y div CAGR
-9.2%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$23.5K
Annual income
$180.81
Full CSRLF calculator →
SBUX
SBUX
● Live price
2.75%
Share price
$89.59
Annual div
$2.46
5Y div CAGR
48.3%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$157.5K
Annual income
$65,840.13
Full SBUX calculator →

Portfolio growth — CSRLF vs SBUX

📍 SBUX pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodCSRLFSBUX
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, CSRLF + SBUX cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
CSRLF pays
SBUX pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

CSRLF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$340.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$153.69/yr
SBUX
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$233.40/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$55,964.11/yr
At 15% tax rate, SBUX beats the other by $55,810.42/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of CSRLF + SBUX for your $10,000?

CSRLF: 50%SBUX: 50%
100% SBUX50/50100% CSRLF
Portfolio after 10yr
$90.5K
Annual income
$33,010.47/yr
Blended yield
36.47%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on SBUX right now

CSRLF
Analyst Ratings
1
Hold
Consensus: Hold
Altman Z
6.0
Piotroski
6/9
SBUX
Analyst Ratings
28
Buy
27
Hold
3
Sell
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$104.00
+16.1% upside vs current
Range: $90.00 — $120.00
Altman Z
2.6
Piotroski
5/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

CSRLF buys
0
SBUX buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for CSRLF or SBUX in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricCSRLFSBUX
Forward yield4.00%2.75%
Annual dividend / share$0.23$2.46
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR-9.2%48.3%
Portfolio after 10y$23.5K$157.5K
Annual income after 10y$180.81$65,840.13
Total dividends collected$2.7K$127.5K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockConsumer Discretionary
Analyst consensusHoldBuy

Year-by-year: CSRLF vs SBUX ($10,000, DRIP)

YearCSRLF PortfolioCSRLF Income/yrSBUX PortfolioSBUX Income/yrGap
1← crossover$11,063$363.20$11,107$407.21$44.00SBUX
2$12,179$340.98$12,512$626.87$333.00SBUX
3$13,350$318.53$14,366$978.69$1.0KSBUX
4$14,580$296.29$16,929$1,557.50$2.3KSBUX
5$15,876$274.61$20,658$2,543.80$4.8KSBUX
6$17,241$253.74$26,406$4,302.22$9.2KSBUX
7$18,681$233.84$35,877$7,622.00$17.2KSBUX
8$20,204$215.02$52,741$14,352.64$32.5KSBUX
9$21,816$197.33$85,676$29,243.03$63.9KSBUX
10$23,524$180.81$157,513$65,840.13$134.0KSBUX

CSRLF vs SBUX: Complete Analysis 2026

CSRLFStock

CSR Limited, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the manufacture and supply of building products for residential and commercial constructions in Australia and New Zealand. It operates through Building Products, Property, and Aluminium segments. The Building Products segment offers interior systems, including gyprock plasterboards, Martini acoustic insulation products, and Rondo rolled formed steel products, as well as Himmel and Potter interior systems that supplies ceiling tiles, aluminum partitions, and architectural hardware products; construction systems, such as Hebel autoclaved aerated concrete products, AFS walling systems, cladding systems, and Cemintel fiber cement; masonry and insulation solutions comprising Bradford insulations, Bradford energy solutions, Edmonds ventilation systems, and Monier roofing solutions; and bricks, including PGH Bricks and pavers. The company's Property segment sells former operating sites. This segment is also involved in the large-scale developments in New South Wales, Queensland, and Victoria. Its Aluminium segment offers aluminium ingots, billets, and slabs. CSR Limited was founded in 1855 and is headquartered in North Ryde, Australia.

Full CSRLF Calculator →

SBUXConsumer Discretionary

Starbucks Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a roaster, marketer, and retailer of specialty coffee worldwide. The company operates through three segments: North America, International, and Channel Development. Its stores offer coffee and tea beverages, roasted whole beans and ground coffees, single serve products, and ready-to-drink beverages; and various food products, such as pastries, breakfast sandwiches, and lunch items. The company also licenses its trademarks through licensed stores, and grocery and foodservice accounts. The company offers its products under the Starbucks, Teavana, Seattle's Best Coffee, Evolution Fresh, Ethos, Starbucks Reserve, and Princi brands. As of October 3, 2021, it operated 16,826 company-operated and licensed stores in North America; and 17,007 company-operated and licensed stores internationally. The company was founded in 1971 and is based in Seattle, Washington.

Full SBUX Calculator →
📬

Get this CSRLF vs SBUX comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

CSRLF vs SCHDCSRLF vs JEPICSRLF vs OCSRLF vs KOCSRLF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.