Home › Compare › EPGRQ vs NOBL

EPGRQ vs NOBL: Dividend Comparison 2026

EPGRQ yields 200000000.00% · NOBL yields 4.00%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 EPGRQ wins by $4.875657285131069e+59M in total portfolio value
10 years
EPGRQ
EPGRQ
● Live price
200000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.875657285131069e+59M
Annual income
$487,565,248,955,786,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full EPGRQ calculator →
NOBL
NOBL
● Live price
4.00%
Share price
$50.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
5%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$28.0K
Annual income
$899.19
Full NOBL calculator →

Portfolio growth — EPGRQ vs NOBL

📍 EPGRQ pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodEPGRQNOBL
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, EPGRQ + NOBL cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan
—
Feb
—
Mar
—
Apr
—
May
—
Jun
—
Jul
—
Aug
—
Sep
—
Oct
—
Nov
—
Dec
—
EPGRQ pays
NOBL pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

EPGRQ
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$17,000,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$414,430,461,612,418,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
NOBL
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$340.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$764.31/yr
At 15% tax rate, EPGRQ beats the other by $414,430,461,612,418,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of EPGRQ + NOBL for your $10,000?

EPGRQ: 50%NOBL: 50%
100% NOBL50/50100% EPGRQ
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.4378286425655345e+59M
Annual income
$243,782,624,477,893,130,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
100.00%
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

EPGRQ buys
0
NOBL buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for EPGRQ or NOBL in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricEPGRQNOBL
Forward yield200000000.00% ✓4.00%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$2.00
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%5% ✓
5-year div CAGR0%5% ✓
Portfolio after 10y$4.875657285131069e+59M$28.0K ✓
Annual income after 10y$487,565,248,955,786,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓$899.19
Total dividends collected$4.875656971401711e+59M$6.4K ✓
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockETF

Year-by-year: EPGRQ vs NOBL ($10,000, DRIP)

YearEPGRQ PortfolioEPGRQ Income/yrNOBL PortfolioNOBL Income/yrGap
1← crossover$20,000,010,700$20,000,000,000.00$11,120$420.00+$20000.00M → EPGRQ
2$37,383,218,970,104,910$37,383,197,570,093,464.00$12,357$458.31+$37383218970.09M → EPGRQ
3$65,303,942,472,059,150,000,000$65,303,902,472,014,860,000,000.00$13,721$499.76+$65303942472059152.00M → EPGRQ
4$106,615,009,060,306,890,000,000,000,000$106,614,939,185,088,440,000,000,000,000.00$15,227$544.58+$1.0661500906030689e+23M → EPGRQ
5$162,672,273,967,082,950,000,000,000,000,000,000$162,672,159,889,023,270,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$16,885$593.02+$1.6267227396708296e+29M → EPGRQ
6$231,966,340,306,755,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$231,966,166,247,422,140,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$18,713$645.34+$2.319663403067553e+35M → EPGRQ
7$309,138,182,305,146,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$309,137,934,101,162,400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$20,724$701.81+$3.091381823051466e+41M → EPGRQ
8$385,031,777,252,258,400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$385,031,446,474,403,340,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$22,938$762.73+$3.850317772522584e+47M → EPGRQ
9$448,184,411,799,345,900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$448,183,999,815,344,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$25,372$828.41+$4.481844117993459e+53M → EPGRQ
10$487,565,728,513,106,900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$487,565,248,955,786,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$28,047$899.19+$4.875657285131069e+59M → EPGRQ

EPGRQ vs NOBL: Complete Analysis 2026

EPGRQ — Stock

Environmental Power Corporation engages in the development, ownership, and operation of renewable energy production facilities in the United States. The company develops renewable energy facilities for the production and commercial application of methane-rich biogas produced from animal, food industry, and other organic wastes. The biogas could be sold to end-users or used to produce pipeline-grade methane, which is referred as renewable natural gas, liquefied natural gas, compressed natural gas, and renewable electrical energy or thermal energy, as well as to produce other useful by-products. Environmental Power Corporation operates three single digester facilities in Wisconsin. The company was founded in 1982 and is headquartered in Tarrytown, New York.

Full EPGRQ Calculator →

NOBL — ETF

NOBL is a dividend-paying stock. Use this calculator to estimate your future dividend income, DRIP compounding returns, and passive income potential from investing in NOBL shares.

Full NOBL Calculator →
📬

Get this EPGRQ vs NOBL comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

EPGRQ vs SCHDEPGRQ vs JEPIEPGRQ vs OEPGRQ vs KOEPGRQ vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.