HomeCompareFANG vs VRTS

FANG vs VRTS: Dividend Comparison 2026

FANG yields 2.04% · VRTS yields 7.14%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 VRTS wins by $50520.94M in total portfolio value
10 years
FANG
FANG
● Live price
2.04%
Share price
$198.65
Annual div
$4.05
5Y div CAGR
100%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$69.70M
Annual income
$63,694,114.45
Full FANG calculator →
VRTS
VRTS
● Live price
7.14%
Share price
$130.20
Annual div
$9.30
5Y div CAGR
100%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$50590.63M
Annual income
$49,265,648,570.14
Full VRTS calculator →

Portfolio growth — FANG vs VRTS

📍 VRTS pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodFANGVRTS
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, FANG + VRTS cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
FANG pays
VRTS pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

FANG
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$173.29/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$54,139,997.28/yr
VRTS
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$607.14/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$41,875,801,284.62/yr
At 15% tax rate, VRTS beats the other by $41,821,661,287.34/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of FANG + VRTS for your $10,000?

FANG: 50%VRTS: 50%
100% VRTS50/50100% FANG
Portfolio after 10yr
$25330.16M
Annual income
$24,664,671,342.30/yr
Blended yield
97.37%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on FANG right now

FANG
Analyst Ratings
1
Strong
45
Buy
5
Hold
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$182.64
-8.1% upside vs current
Range: $100.00 — $240.00
Altman Z
1.6
Piotroski
5/9
VRTS
Analyst Ratings
4
Buy
5
Hold
2
Sell
Consensus: Hold
Price Target
$167.67
+28.8% upside vs current
Range: $142.00 — $206.00
Altman Z
0.9
Piotroski
5/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

FANG buys
0
VRTS buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for FANG or VRTS in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricFANGVRTS
Forward yield2.04%7.14%
Annual dividend / share$4.05$9.30
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR100%100%
Portfolio after 10y$69.70M$50590.63M
Annual income after 10y$63,694,114.45$49,265,648,570.14
Total dividends collected$69.21M$50499.69M
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorEnergyStock
Analyst consensusBuyHold
Analyst price target$182.64$167.67

Year-by-year: FANG vs VRTS ($10,000, DRIP)

YearFANG PortfolioFANG Income/yrVRTS PortfolioVRTS Income/yrGap
1← crossover$11,108$407.75$12,129$1,428.57$1.0KVRTS
2$12,732$846.58$16,216$3,238.60$3.5KVRTS
3$15,437$1,813.77$25,445$8,093.62$10.0KVRTS
4$20,628$4,110.50$50,964$23,737.87$30.3KVRTS
5$32,339$10,266.86$143,400$88,868.92$111.1KVRTS
6$64,688$30,085.07$620,832$467,394.11$556.1KVRTS
7$181,701$112,484.96$4,446,571$3,782,280.18$4.26MVRTS
8$784,997$590,576.84$55,392,819$50,634,987.90$54.61MVRTS
9$5,609,019$4,769,072.49$1,238,301,169$1,179,030,852.41$1232.69MVRTS
10$69,695,765$63,694,114.45$50,590,630,820$49,265,648,570.14$50520.94MVRTS

FANG vs VRTS: Complete Analysis 2026

FANGEnergy

Diamondback Energy, Inc., an independent oil and natural gas company, focuses on the acquisition, development, exploration, and exploitation of unconventional and onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. It focuses on the development of the Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations of the Midland basin; and the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations of the Delaware basin, which are part of the Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico. As of December 31, 2021, the company's total acreage position was approximately 524,700 gross acres in the Permian Basin; and estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves were 1,788,991 thousand barrels of crude oil equivalent. It also held working interests in 5,289 gross producing wells, as well as royalty interests in 6,455 additional wells. In addition, the company owns mineral interests approximately 930,871 gross acres and 27,027 net royalty acres in the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale; and owns, operates, develops, and acquires midstream infrastructure assets, including 866 miles of crude oil gathering pipelines, natural gas gathering pipelines, and an integrated water system in the Midland and Delaware Basins of the Permian Basin. Diamondback Energy, Inc. was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Full FANG Calculator →

VRTSStock

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is a publicly owned investment manager. The firm primarily provides its services to individual and institutional clients. It launches separate client focused equity and fixed income portfolios. The firm launches equity, fixed income, and balanced mutual funds for its clients. It invests in the public equity, fixed income, and real estate markets. The firm also invests in exchange traded funds. It employs a multi manager approach for its products. The firm employs quantitative analysis to make its investments. It benchmarks the performance of its portfolios against the S&P 500 Index. The firm conducts in-house research to make its investments. Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. was founded in 1988 and is based in Hartford, Connecticut.

Full VRTS Calculator →
📬

Get this FANG vs VRTS comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

FANG vs SCHDFANG vs JEPIFANG vs OFANG vs KOFANG vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.