Is FLTDF or SBUX a better dividend investment in 2026?

FLTDF currently yields 40.34% with a 5% 5-year dividend growth rate. SBUX yields 2.84% with 5% growth. The better choice depends on your goal: FLTDF offers higher current income.

What is the dividend yield difference between FLTDF and SBUX?

FLTDF has a forward dividend yield of 40.34% ($9.40/share annually). SBUX yields 2.84% ($2.46/share annually). The yield gap is 37.50 percentage points.

Home › Compare › FLTDF vs SBUX

FLTDF vs SBUX: Dividend Comparison 2026

FLTDF yields 40.34% · SBUX yields 2.84%● Live data

vsPost on X →

After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled

🏆 FLTDF wins by $69.2K in total portfolio value

INVESTMENT

TIME HORIZON10 years

FLTDF

● Live price

40.34%

Share price

$23.30

Annual div

$9.40

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$236.2K

Annual income

$40,204.50

Full FLTDF calculator →

SBUX

● Live price

2.84%

Share price

$86.72

Annual div

$2.46

5Y div CAGR

48.3%

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$167.0K

Annual income

$71,136.45

Full SBUX calculator →

Portfolio growth — FLTDF vs SBUX

📍 FLTDF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis Period	FLTDF	SBUX
2008–2009 GFC	— No data	— No data
2020 Q1–Q2 COVID	— No data	— No data
2022 Q4 Rate Hike	— No data	— No data

Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.

📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, FLTDF + SBUX cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan

—

Feb

—

Mar

—

Apr

—

May

—

Jun

—

Jul

—

Aug

—

Sep

—

Oct

—

Nov

—

Dec

—

FLTDF pays

SBUX pays

Both pay

Neither

💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

FLTDF

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$3,429.18/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$34,173.83/yr

SBUX

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$241.12/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$60,465.98/yr

At 15% tax rate, SBUX beats the other by $26,292.16/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000

⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of FLTDF + SBUX for your $10,000?

FLTDF: 50%SBUX: 50%

100% SBUX50/50100% FLTDF

Portfolio after 10yr

$201.6K

Annual income

$55,670.48/yr

Blended yield

27.61%

📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on SBUX right now

FLTDF

No analyst data

SBUX

Analyst Ratings

Buy

Hold

Sell

Consensus: Buy

Price Target

$104.00

+19.9% upside vs current

Range: $90.00 — $120.00

Altman Z

2.6

Piotroski

5/9

Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.

🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

FLTDF buys

SBUX buys

No recent congressional trades found for FLTDF or SBUX in the last 90 days.

STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →

MetricFLTDFSBUX

Forward yield	40.34% ✓	2.84%
Annual dividend / share	$9.40 ✓	$2.46
Payout ratio	50%	50%
1-year div growth	0%	0%
5-year div CAGR	0%	48.3% ✓
Portfolio after 10y	$236.2K ✓	$167.0K
Annual income after 10y	$40,204.50	$71,136.45 ✓
Total dividends collected	$178.2K ✓	$136.4K
Payment frequency	quarterly	quarterly
Sector	Stock	Consumer Discretionary

Year-by-year: FLTDF vs SBUX ($10,000, DRIP)

Year	FLTDF Portfolio	FLTDF Income/yr	SBUX Portfolio	SBUX Income/yr	Gap
1← crossover	$14,734	$4,034.33	$11,121	$420.68	+$3.6K → FLTDF
2	$21,321	$5,555.44	$12,548	$648.40	+$8.8K → FLTDF
3	$30,327	$7,513.04	$14,440	$1,013.98	+$15.9K → FLTDF
4	$42,437	$9,987.25	$17,068	$1,617.30	+$25.4K → FLTDF
5	$58,468	$13,061.10	$20,912	$2,649.52	+$37.6K → FLTDF
6	$79,379	$16,818.02	$26,875	$4,499.29	+$52.5K → FLTDF
7	$106,275	$21,339.12	$36,771	$8,014.12	+$69.5K → FLTDF
8	$140,415	$26,700.32	$54,542	$15,197.11	+$85.9K → FLTDF
9	$183,213	$32,969.61	$89,602	$31,242.49	+$93.6K → FLTDF
10	$236,243	$40,204.50	$167,011	$71,136.45	+$69.2K → FLTDF

FLTDF vs SBUX: Complete Analysis 2026

FLTDF — Stock

Flow Traders N.V. operates as a financial technology-enabled liquidity provider in financial products in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. It provides liquidity that allows investors to continue to buy or sell exchange traded products or other financial instruments. The company offers liquidity through on screen, which is conducted on stock exchanges; and off exchange through request for quote platforms. The company was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Full FLTDF Calculator →

SBUX — Consumer Discretionary

Starbucks Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a roaster, marketer, and retailer of specialty coffee worldwide. The company operates through three segments: North America, International, and Channel Development. Its stores offer coffee and tea beverages, roasted whole beans and ground coffees, single serve products, and ready-to-drink beverages; and various food products, such as pastries, breakfast sandwiches, and lunch items. The company also licenses its trademarks through licensed stores, and grocery and foodservice accounts. The company offers its products under the Starbucks, Teavana, Seattle's Best Coffee, Evolution Fresh, Ethos, Starbucks Reserve, and Princi brands. As of October 3, 2021, it operated 16,826 company-operated and licensed stores in North America; and 17,007 company-operated and licensed stores internationally. The company was founded in 1971 and is based in Seattle, Washington.

Full SBUX Calculator →

📬

Get this FLTDF vs SBUX comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

FLTDF vs SCHD FLTDF vs JEPI FLTDF vs O FLTDF vs KO FLTDF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.