HomeCompareGMLPF vs QSR

GMLPF vs QSR: Dividend Comparison 2026

GMLPF yields 84.14% · QSR yields 3.40%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 GMLPF wins by $13.2K in total portfolio value
10 years
GMLPF
GMLPF
● Live price
84.14%
Share price
$0.65
Annual div
$0.55
5Y div CAGR
-50%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$37.9K
Annual income
$15.84
Full GMLPF calculator →
QSR
QSR
● Live price
3.40%
Share price
$73.76
Annual div
$2.51
5Y div CAGR
-0.8%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$24.7K
Annual income
$387.88
Full QSR calculator →

Portfolio growth — GMLPF vs QSR

📍 GMLPF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodGMLPFQSR
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, GMLPF + QSR cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
GMLPF pays
QSR pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

GMLPF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$7,151.51/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$13.46/yr
QSR
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$289.25/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$329.70/yr
At 15% tax rate, QSR beats the other by $316.23/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of GMLPF + QSR for your $10,000?

GMLPF: 50%QSR: 50%
100% QSR50/50100% GMLPF
Portfolio after 10yr
$31.3K
Annual income
$201.86/yr
Blended yield
0.64%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on QSR right now

GMLPF
No analyst data
Altman Z
-0.1
Piotroski
5/9
QSR
Analyst Ratings
27
Buy
15
Hold
2
Sell
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$81.57
+10.6% upside vs current
Range: $71.00 — $90.00
Altman Z
1.4
Piotroski
7/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

GMLPF buys
0
QSR buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for GMLPF or QSR in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricGMLPFQSR
Forward yield84.14%3.40%
Annual dividend / share$0.55$2.51
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR-50%-0.8%
Portfolio after 10y$37.9K$24.7K
Annual income after 10y$15.84$387.88
Total dividends collected$10.8K$3.7K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockStock

Year-by-year: GMLPF vs QSR ($10,000, DRIP)

YearGMLPF PortfolioGMLPF Income/yrQSR PortfolioQSR Income/yrGap
1← crossover$14,907$4,206.77$11,038$337.57+$3.9KGMLPF
2$18,881$2,930.34$12,156$345.43+$6.7KGMLPF
3$21,937$1,734.35$13,359$352.69+$8.6KGMLPF
4$24,414$941.62$14,654$359.36+$9.8KGMLPF
5$26,612$489.70$16,045$365.45+$10.6KGMLPF
6$28,725$249.44$17,539$370.97+$11.2KGMLPF
7$30,861$125.81$19,143$375.96+$11.7KGMLPF
8$33,085$63.16$20,863$380.42+$12.2KGMLPF
9$35,432$31.64$22,708$384.39+$12.7KGMLPF
10$37,928$15.84$24,685$387.88+$13.2KGMLPF

GMLPF vs QSR: Complete Analysis 2026

GMLPFStock

Golar LNG Partners owns floating storage and regasification units and liquefied natural gas carriers. Golar LNG Partners are a growth-oriented limited partnership formed by Golar LNG Limited (NasdaqGS: GLNG; OSE: GOL) to own and operate floating storage and regasification units (or FSRUs) and LNG carriers under long-term charters, which they define as charters of five years or more. They intend to leverage the relationships, expertise, and reputation of Golar, a leading independent owner, and operator of FSRUs and LNG carriers, to pursue growth opportunities in these areas. While they intend to operate their assets under long-term charters with stable cash flows, Golar intends to focus primarily on FSRU and LNG project development, LNG trading and LNG transportation, storage, and regasification activities with contract terms and associated cash flows that are more short-term and/or variable in nature.

Full GMLPF Calculator →

QSRStock

Restaurant Brands International Inc. operates as quick service restaurant company in Canada and internationally. It operates through four segments: Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK), Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (PLK), and Firehouse Subs (FHS). The company owns and franchises TH chain of donut/coffee/tea restaurants that offer blend coffee, tea, and espresso-based hot and cold specialty drinks; and fresh baked goods, including donuts, Timbits, bagels, muffins, cookies and pastries, grilled paninis, classic sandwiches, wraps, soups, and others. It is also involved in owning and franchising BK, a fast food hamburger restaurant chain, which offers flame-grilled hamburgers, chicken and other specialty sandwiches, french fries, soft drinks, and other food items; and PLK quick service restaurants that provide Louisiana style fried chicken, chicken tenders, fried shrimp and other seafood, red beans and rice, and other regional items. In addition, the company owns and franchises FHS restaurants quick service restaurants that offer subs, soft drinks, and local specialties. As of February 15, 2022, the company had approximately 29,000 restaurants in 100 countries under the Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes, And Firehouse Subs brands. Restaurant Brands International Inc. was founded in 1954 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Full QSR Calculator →
📬

Get this GMLPF vs QSR comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

GMLPF vs SCHDGMLPF vs JEPIGMLPF vs OGMLPF vs KOGMLPF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.