Is GMSQF or JEPI a better dividend investment in 2026?

GMSQF currently yields 1481.48% with a 5% 5-year dividend growth rate. JEPI yields 8.40% with 2.1% growth. The better choice depends on your goal: GMSQF offers higher current income.

What is the dividend yield difference between GMSQF and JEPI?

GMSQF has a forward dividend yield of 1481.48% ($2.00/share annually). JEPI yields 8.40% ($4.76/share annually). The yield gap is 1473.08 percentage points.

Home › Compare › GMSQF vs JEPI

GMSQF vs JEPI: Dividend Comparison 2026

GMSQF yields 1481.48% · JEPI yields 8.40%● Live data

vsPost on X →

After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled

🏆 GMSQF wins by $626785561.43M in total portfolio value

INVESTMENT

TIME HORIZON10 years

GMSQF

● Live price

1481.48%

Share price

$0.14

Annual div

$2.00

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$626785561.46M

Annual income

$553,314,905,198,340.25

Full GMSQF calculator →

JEPI

JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF

● Live price

8.40%

Share price

$56.68

Annual div

$4.76

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$29.0K

Annual income

$1,528.62

Full JEPI calculator →

Portfolio growth — GMSQF vs JEPI

📍 GMSQF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis Period	GMSQF	JEPI
2008–2009 GFC	— No data	— No data
2020 Q1–Q2 COVID	— No data	— No data
2022 Q4 Rate Hike	— No data	— No data

Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.

📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, GMSQF + JEPI cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan

—

Feb

—

Mar

—

Apr

—

May

—

Jun

—

Jul

—

Aug

—

Sep

—

Oct

—

Nov

—

Dec

—

GMSQF pays

JEPI pays

Both pay

Neither

💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

GMSQF

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$125,925.93/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$470,317,669,418,589.20/yr

JEPI

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$714.16/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$1,299.33/yr

At 15% tax rate, GMSQF beats the other by $470,317,669,417,289.90/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000

⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of GMSQF + JEPI for your $10,000?

GMSQF: 50%JEPI: 50%

100% JEPI50/50100% GMSQF

Portfolio after 10yr

$313392780.74M

Annual income

$276,657,452,599,934.44/yr

Blended yield

88.28%

🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

GMSQF buys

JEPI buys

No recent congressional trades found for GMSQF or JEPI in the last 90 days.

STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →

MetricGMSQFJEPI

Forward yield	1481.48% ✓	8.40%
Annual dividend / share	$2.00	$4.76 ✓
Payout ratio	50%	50%
1-year div growth	0%	0%
5-year div CAGR	0%	0%
Portfolio after 10y	$626785561.46M ✓	$29.0K
Annual income after 10y	$553,314,905,198,340.25 ✓	$1,528.62
Total dividends collected	$621430185.90M ✓	$11.7K
Payment frequency	quarterly	monthly
Sector	Stock	ETF

Year-by-year: GMSQF vs JEPI ($10,000, DRIP)

Year	GMSQF Portfolio	GMSQF Income/yr	JEPI Portfolio	JEPI Income/yr	Gap
1← crossover	$158,848	$148,148.15	$11,260	$840.19	+$147.6K → GMSQF
2	$2,369,319	$2,199,351.31	$12,641	$907.94	+$2.36M → GMSQF
3	$33,193,761	$30,658,589.95	$14,150	$978.20	+$33.18M → GMSQF
4	$436,939,498	$401,422,173.47	$15,795	$1,050.85	+$436.92M → GMSQF
5	$5,405,881,572	$4,938,356,308.99	$17,584	$1,125.74	+$5405.86M → GMSQF
6	$62,885,313,260	$57,101,019,978.27	$19,526	$1,202.74	+$62885.29M → GMSQF
7	$688,074,536,789	$620,787,251,600.62	$21,628	$1,281.69	+$688074.52M → GMSQF
8	$7,084,361,831,143	$6,348,122,076,778.87	$23,898	$1,362.43	+$7084361.81M → GMSQF
9	$68,664,164,726,111	$61,083,897,566,788.09	$26,347	$1,444.79	+$68664164.70M → GMSQF
10	$626,785,561,455,279	$553,314,905,198,340.25	$28,982	$1,528.62	+$626785561.43M → GMSQF

GMSQF vs JEPI: Complete Analysis 2026

GMSQF — Stock

GameSquare Esports Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as a gaming and esports company in Canada. The company operates in two segments, Teams, and Agency Services. The Teams segment provides sponsorships, prizes, and players to teams. The Agency Services segment represents esports players and influencers, including Twitch streamers, YouTubers, and gaming personalities, as well as other on-screen talent, such as commentators, analysts, event hosts, and production crew. This segment also provides consulting services to individuals and businesses operating in various roles in the esports industry, including ventures, sponsors, and investors; tournament organizers; game publishers and developers; and producers and broadcasters, as well as advises players, influencers, and other on-screen talent in the esports industry on matters relating to the production of events and campaigns. In addition, this segment offers digital media, as well as gaming and lifestyle marketing agency services. GameSquare Esports Inc. is based in Toronto, Canada.

Full GMSQF Calculator →

JEPI — ETF

The fund seeks to provide the majority of the returns associated with its primary benchmark, the Standard & Poor's 500 Total Return Index (S&P 500 Index), while exposing investors to less risk through lower volatility and still offering incremental income. Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities. It may also invest in other equity securities not included in the S&P 500 Index.

Full JEPI Calculator →

📬

Get this GMSQF vs JEPI comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

GMSQF vs SCHD GMSQF vs O GMSQF vs KO GMSQF vs MAIN GMSQF vs JEPQ GMSQF vs XYLD GMSQF vs DIVO GMSQF vs QYLD

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.