HomeCompareJPUHF vs QYLD

JPUHF vs QYLD: Dividend Comparison 2026

JPUHF yields 4.35% · QYLD yields 11.92%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 JPUHF wins by $1.2K in total portfolio value
10 years
JPUHF
JPUHF
● Live price
4.35%
Share price
$101.41
Annual div
$4.41
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$26.6K
Annual income
$574.77
Full JPUHF calculator →
QYLD
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
● Live price
11.92%
Share price
$17.15
Annual div
$2.04
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$25.4K
Annual income
$5,659.31
Full QYLD calculator →

Portfolio growth — JPUHF vs QYLD

📍 JPUHF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodJPUHFQYLD
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, JPUHF + QYLD cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
JPUHF pays
QYLD pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

JPUHF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$369.67/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$488.55/yr
QYLD
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$1,013.51/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,810.41/yr
At 15% tax rate, QYLD beats the other by $4,321.86/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of JPUHF + QYLD for your $10,000?

JPUHF: 50%QYLD: 50%
100% QYLD50/50100% JPUHF
Portfolio after 10yr
$26.0K
Annual income
$3,117.05/yr
Blended yield
12.00%
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

JPUHF buys
0
QYLD buys
1
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
Tim Moore🏢 House$QYLD▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002025-05-02
Tim Moore🏢 House$QYLD▲ Buy$15,001 - $50,0002025-04-07
Dwight Evans🏢 House$QYLD▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002022-11-14
Dwight Evans🏢 House$QYLD▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002020-10-29
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricJPUHFQYLD
Forward yield4.35%11.92%
Annual dividend / share$4.41$2.04
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%0%
Portfolio after 10y$26.6K$25.4K
Annual income after 10y$574.77$5,659.31
Total dividends collected$5.1K$27.1K
Payment frequencyquarterlymonthly
SectorStockETF

Year-by-year: JPUHF vs QYLD ($10,000, DRIP)

YearJPUHF PortfolioJPUHF Income/yrQYLD PortfolioQYLD Income/yrGap
1← crossover$11,135$434.90$10,352$1,192.36+$783.00JPUHF
2$12,367$452.58$10,830$1,347.57+$1.5KJPUHF
3$13,702$469.77$11,460$1,539.07+$2.2KJPUHF
4$15,148$486.45$12,275$1,777.84+$2.9KJPUHF
5$16,711$502.59$13,323$2,078.95+$3.4KJPUHF
6$18,399$518.17$14,667$2,463.34+$3.7KJPUHF
7$20,220$533.19$16,396$2,960.57+$3.8KJPUHF
8$22,183$547.63$18,631$3,612.97+$3.6KJPUHF
9$24,297$561.49$21,548$4,482.15+$2.7KJPUHF
10$26,573$574.77$25,398$5,659.31+$1.2KJPUHF

JPUHF vs QYLD: Complete Analysis 2026

JPUHFStock

The Sub-Fund aims to provide current income while seeking to maintain a low volatility of principal.

Full JPUHF Calculator →

QYLDETF

The Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index.

Full QYLD Calculator →
📬

Get this JPUHF vs QYLD comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

JPUHF vs SCHDJPUHF vs JEPIJPUHF vs OJPUHF vs KOJPUHF vs MAINJPUHF vs XYLDJPUHF vs JEPQJPUHF vs RYLD

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.