Is LFTSF or XYLD a better dividend investment in 2026?

LFTSF currently yields 856.53% with a 5% 5-year dividend growth rate. XYLD yields 10.98% with 0.5% growth. The better choice depends on your goal: LFTSF offers higher current income.

What is the dividend yield difference between LFTSF and XYLD?

LFTSF has a forward dividend yield of 856.53% ($2.00/share annually). XYLD yields 10.98% ($4.30/share annually). The yield gap is 845.55 percentage points.

Home › Compare › LFTSF vs XYLD

LFTSF vs XYLD: Dividend Comparison 2026

LFTSF yields 856.53% · XYLD yields 10.98%● Live data

vsPost on X →

After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled

🏆 LFTSF wins by $4953341.04M in total portfolio value

INVESTMENT

TIME HORIZON10 years

LFTSF

● Live price

856.53%

Share price

$0.23

Annual div

$2.00

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$4953341.07M

Annual income

$4,028,203,932,069.97

Full LFTSF calculator →

XYLD

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

● Live price

10.98%

Share price

$39.13

Annual div

$4.30

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$25.3K

Annual income

$3,219.02

Full XYLD calculator →

Portfolio growth — LFTSF vs XYLD

📍 LFTSF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis Period	LFTSF	XYLD
2008–2009 GFC	— No data	— No data
2020 Q1–Q2 COVID	— No data	— No data
2022 Q4 Rate Hike	— No data	— No data

Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.

📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, LFTSF + XYLD cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan

—

Feb

—

Mar

—

Apr

—

May

—

Jun

—

Jul

—

Aug

—

Sep

—

Oct

—

Nov

—

Dec

—

LFTSF pays

XYLD pays

Both pay

Neither

💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

LFTSF

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$72,805.14/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$3,423,973,342,259.47/yr

XYLD

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$933.63/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$2,736.17/yr

At 15% tax rate, LFTSF beats the other by $3,423,973,339,523.31/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000

⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of LFTSF + XYLD for your $10,000?

LFTSF: 50%XYLD: 50%

100% XYLD50/50100% LFTSF

Portfolio after 10yr

$2476670.55M

Annual income

$2,014,101,967,644.50/yr

Blended yield

81.32%

🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

LFTSF buys

XYLD buys

No recent congressional trades found for LFTSF or XYLD in the last 90 days.

STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →

MetricLFTSFXYLD

Forward yield	856.53% ✓	10.98%
Annual dividend / share	$2.00	$4.30 ✓
Payout ratio	50%	50%
1-year div growth	0%	0%
5-year div CAGR	0%	0%
Portfolio after 10y	$4953341.07M ✓	$25.3K
Annual income after 10y	$4,028,203,932,069.97 ✓	$3,219.02
Total dividends collected	$4880994.69M ✓	$19.6K
Payment frequency	quarterly	monthly
Sector	Stock	ETF

Year-by-year: LFTSF vs XYLD ($10,000, DRIP)

Year	LFTSF Portfolio	LFTSF Income/yr	XYLD Portfolio	XYLD Income/yr	Gap
1← crossover	$96,353	$85,653.10	$10,818	$1,098.39	+$85.5K → LFTSF
2	$874,401	$771,303.05	$11,738	$1,222.51	+$862.7K → LFTSF
3	$7,477,241	$6,541,632.41	$12,774	$1,364.64	+$7.46M → LFTSF
4	$60,280,359	$52,279,710.74	$13,944	$1,527.86	+$60.27M → LFTSF
5	$458,398,033	$393,898,049.15	$15,270	$1,715.87	+$458.38M → LFTSF
6	$3,289,898,850	$2,799,412,954.23	$16,775	$1,933.09	+$3289.88M → LFTSF
7	$22,297,052,718	$18,776,860,948.27	$18,490	$2,184.87	+$22297.03M → LFTSF
8	$142,791,326,705	$118,933,480,296.78	$20,450	$2,477.63	+$142791.31M → LFTSF
9	$864,614,147,368	$711,827,427,794.28	$22,697	$2,819.19	+$864614.12M → LFTSF
10	$4,953,341,069,754	$4,028,203,932,069.97	$25,280	$3,219.02	+$4953341.04M → LFTSF

LFTSF vs XYLD: Complete Analysis 2026

LFTSF — Stock

LifeTech Scientific Corporation, an investment holding company, develops, manufactures, and trades in interventional medical devices for cardiovascular and peripheral vascular diseases and disorders. The company operates through Structural Heart Diseases Business, Peripheral Vascular Diseases Business, and Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology Business segments. Its products include LAmbre left atrial appendage closure systems, as well as CeraFlex, Cera, Heart, and Konara-MF VSD occluders; Ankura thoracic aortic aneurysm and abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft systems; delivery systems, such as Fustar steerable and SteerEase introducers; Aegisy vena cava filters; Cera vascular plug systems; AcuMark sizing balloons; LawMax dilators; and SeQure snare systems, as well as pacemakers. The company is also involved in the biomedical research and development; manufacturing and trading of materials for hemp; staff training and internal personnel management business; information consulting for investors; and manufacturing and trading of medical devices, as well as technical, consulting, and technology services. It has operations in Mainland China, India, rest of Asia, Europe, South America, Africa, and internationally. LifeTech Scientific Corporation was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Shenzhen, the People's Republic of China.

Full LFTSF Calculator →

XYLD — ETF

The Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index.

Full XYLD Calculator →

📬

Get this LFTSF vs XYLD comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

LFTSF vs SCHD LFTSF vs JEPI LFTSF vs O LFTSF vs KO LFTSF vs MAIN LFTSF vs QYLD LFTSF vs JEPQ LFTSF vs RYLD

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.