HomeCompareLNG vs ARES

LNG vs ARES: Dividend Comparison 2026

LNG yields 0.76% · ARES yields 4.37%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 ARES wins by $2929.62M in total portfolio value
10 years
LNG
LNG
● Live price
0.76%
Share price
$293.64
Annual div
$2.22
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$20.7K
Annual income
$79.41
Full LNG calculator →
ARES
ARES
● Live price
4.37%
Share price
$107.66
Annual div
$4.71
5Y div CAGR
100%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$2929.64M
Annual income
$2,806,406,662.94
Full ARES calculator →

Portfolio growth — LNG vs ARES

📍 ARES pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodLNGARES
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, LNG + ARES cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
LNG pays
ARES pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

LNG
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$64.26/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$67.50/yr
ARES
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$371.87/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$2,385,445,663.50/yr
At 15% tax rate, ARES beats the other by $2,385,445,596.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of LNG + ARES for your $10,000?

LNG: 50%ARES: 50%
100% ARES50/50100% LNG
Portfolio after 10yr
$1464.83M
Annual income
$1,403,203,371.17/yr
Blended yield
95.79%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on LNG right now

LNG
Analyst Ratings
1
Strong
24
Buy
2
Hold
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$260.00
-11.5% upside vs current
Range: $220.00 — $301.00
Altman Z
2.4
Piotroski
6/9
ARES
Analyst Ratings
1
Strong
15
Buy
5
Hold
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$179.25
+66.5% upside vs current
Range: $148.00 — $215.00
Altman Z
1.5
Piotroski
7/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

LNG buys
0
ARES buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for LNG or ARES in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricLNGARES
Forward yield0.76%4.37%
Annual dividend / share$2.22$4.71
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%100%
Portfolio after 10y$20.7K$2929.64M
Annual income after 10y$79.41$2,806,406,662.94
Total dividends collected$777.00$2920.90M
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorEnergyStock
Analyst consensusBuyBuy
Analyst price target$260.00$179.25

Year-by-year: LNG vs ARES ($10,000, DRIP)

YearLNG PortfolioLNG Income/yrARES PortfolioARES Income/yrGap
1← crossover$10,776$75.60$11,575$874.98$799.00ARES
2$11,606$76.14$14,278$1,893.05$2.7KARES
3$12,495$76.64$19,643$4,364.80$7.1KARES
4$13,447$77.11$32,241$11,223.63$18.8KARES
5$14,466$77.56$68,932$34,434.38$54.5KARES
6$15,556$77.98$211,368$137,610.38$195.8KARES
7$16,724$78.37$1,014,866$788,702.55$998.1KARES
8$17,973$78.74$8,164,206$7,078,299.39$8.15MARES
9$19,310$79.08$115,169,668$106,433,966.79$115.15MARES
10$20,741$79.41$2,929,638,207$2,806,406,662.94$2929.62MARES

LNG vs ARES: Complete Analysis 2026

LNGEnergy

Cheniere Energy, Inc., an energy infrastructure company, primarily engages in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) related businesses in the United States. It owns and operates the Sabine Pass LNG terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana; and the Corpus Christi LNG terminal near Corpus Christi, Texas. The company also owns Creole Trail pipeline, a 94-mile natural gas supply pipeline that interconnects the Sabine Pass LNG Terminal with several interstate and intrastate pipelines; and operates Corpus Christi pipeline, a 21.5-mile natural gas supply pipeline that interconnects the Corpus Christi LNG terminal with various interstate and intrastate natural gas pipelines. It is also involved in the LNG and natural gas marketing business. The company was incorporated in 1983 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Full LNG Calculator →

ARESStock

Ares Management Corporation operates as an alternative asset manager in the United States, Europe, and Asia. The company's Tradable Credit Group segment manages various types of investment funds, such as commingled and separately managed accounts for institutional investors, and publicly traded vehicles and sub-advised funds for retail investors in the tradable and non-investment grade corporate credit markets. Its Direct Lending Group segment provides financing solutions to small-to-medium sized companies. The company's Private Equity Group segment focuses on majority or shared-control investments primarily in under-capitalized companies. Its Real Estate Group segment invests in new developments and the repositioning of assets, with a focus on control or majority-control investments; and originates and invests in a range of self-originated financing opportunities for middle-market owners and operators of commercial real estate. The firm was previously known as Ares Management, L.P. Ares Management Corporation was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, California with additional offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. Ares Management GP LLC is the general partner of the company.

Full ARES Calculator →
📬

Get this LNG vs ARES comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

LNG vs SCHDLNG vs JEPILNG vs OLNG vs KOLNG vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.