HomeCompareLNT vs EQT

LNT vs EQT: Dividend Comparison 2026

LNT yields 2.88% · EQT yields 1.00%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 EQT wins by $4.53M in total portfolio value· pulled ahead in Year 4
10 years
LNT
LNT
● Live price
2.88%
Share price
$71.49
Annual div
$2.06
5Y div CAGR
33.6%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$59.1K
Annual income
$12,391.88
Full LNT calculator →
EQT
EQT
● Live price
1.00%
Share price
$64.41
Annual div
$0.65
5Y div CAGR
100%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.59M
Annual income
$3,847,685.36
Full EQT calculator →

Portfolio growth — LNT vs EQT

📍 EQT pulled ahead of the other in Year 4

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodLNTEQT
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, LNT + EQT cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
LNT pays
EQT pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

LNT
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$244.63/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$10,533.10/yr
EQT
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$85.12/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$3,270,532.56/yr
At 15% tax rate, EQT beats the other by $3,259,999.46/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of LNT + EQT for your $10,000?

LNT: 50%EQT: 50%
100% EQT50/50100% LNT
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.32M
Annual income
$1,930,038.62/yr
Blended yield
83.10%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on EQT right now

LNT
Analyst Ratings
12
Buy
11
Hold
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$74.57
+4.3% upside vs current
Range: $67.00 — $78.00
Altman Z
1.1
Piotroski
6/9
EQT
Analyst Ratings
29
Buy
15
Hold
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$41.11
-36.2% upside vs current
Range: $23.00 — $55.00
Altman Z
2.3
Piotroski
8/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

LNT buys
9
EQT buys
0
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
Lisa McClain🏢 House$LNT▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-13
Lisa McClain🏢 House$LNT▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-04
Lois Frankel🏢 House$LNT▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002023-09-08
Lois Frankel🏢 House$LNT▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002023-01-31
Diana Harshbarger🏢 House$LNT▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002022-07-22
Diana Harshbarger🏢 House$LNT▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002022-07-22
Diana Harshbarger🏢 House$LNT▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002022-07-22
Tom Cole🏢 House$LNT▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002022-05-25
Diana Harshbarger🏢 House$LNT▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002022-05-12
Diana Harshbarger🏢 House$LNT▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002022-05-02
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricLNTEQT
Forward yield2.88%1.00%
Annual dividend / share$2.06$0.65
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR33.6%100%
Portfolio after 10y$59.1K$4.59M
Annual income after 10y$12,391.88$3,847,685.36
Total dividends collected$34.5K$4.50M
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorUtilitiesEnergy
Analyst consensusBuyBuy
Analyst price target$74.57$41.11

Year-by-year: LNT vs EQT ($10,000, DRIP)

YearLNT PortfolioLNT Income/yrEQT PortfolioEQT Income/yrGap
1$11,085$384.50$10,900$200.28+$185.00LNT
2$12,393$532.16$12,071$408.06+$322.00LNT
3$14,003$742.86$13,761$844.67+$242.00LNT
4← crossover$16,031$1,048.06$16,524$1,799.81$493.00EQT
5$18,652$1,498.16$21,720$4,039.61$3.1KEQT
6$22,133$2,176.35$33,166$9,925.10$11.0KEQT
7$26,908$3,224.68$63,815$28,327.33$36.9KEQT
8$33,686$4,894.78$170,160$101,878.32$136.5KEQT
9$43,695$7,651.20$689,838$507,766.67$646.1KEQT
10$59,146$12,391.88$4,585,812$3,847,685.36$4.53MEQT

LNT vs EQT: Complete Analysis 2026

LNTUtilities

Alliant Energy Corporation operates as a utility holding company that provides regulated electricity and natural gas services. It operates through three segments: Utility Electric Operations, Utility Gas Operations, and Utility Other. The company, through its subsidiary, Interstate Power and Light Company (IPL), primarily generates and distributes electricity, and distributes and transports natural gas to retail customers in Iowa; sells electricity to wholesale customers in Minnesota, Illinois, and Iowa; and generates and distributes steam in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Alliant Energy Corporation, through its other subsidiary, Wisconsin Power and Light Company (WPL), generates and distributes electricity, and distributes and transports natural gas to retail customers in Wisconsin; and sells electricity to wholesale customers in Wisconsin. As of December 31, 2021, IPL supplied electric and natural gas service to approximately 500,000 and 225,000 retail customers respectively; and WPL supplied electric and natural gas service to approximately 485,000 and 200,000 retail customers, respectively. It serves retail customers in the farming, agriculture, industrial manufacturing, chemical, and packaging and food industries. In addition, the company owns and operates a short-line rail freight service in Iowa; a barge, rail, and truck freight terminal on the Mississippi River; and a rail-served warehouse in Iowa, as well as offers freight brokerage services. Further, it holds interests in a 347 megawatt (MW) natural gas-fired electric generating unit near Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin; and a 225 MW wind farm located in Oklahoma. The company was incorporated in 1981 and is headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin.

Full LNT Calculator →

EQTEnergy

EQT Corporation operates as a natural gas production company in the United States. The company produces natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), including ethane, propane, isobutane, butane, and natural gasoline. As of December 31, 2021, it had 25.0 trillion cubic feet of proved natural gas, NGLs, and crude oil reserves across approximately 2.0 million gross acres, including 1.7 million gross acres in the Marcellus play. The company was founded in 1878 and is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Full EQT Calculator →
📬

Get this LNT vs EQT comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

LNT vs SCHDLNT vs JEPILNT vs OLNT vs KOLNT vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.