Home › Compare › LQAVF vs FCPT

LQAVF vs FCPT: Dividend Comparison 2026

LQAVF yields 2000000.00% · FCPT yields 6.05%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 LQAVF wins by $4.879226400974806e+39M in total portfolio value
10 years
LQAVF
LQAVF
● Live price
2000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.879226400974806e+39M
Annual income
$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full LQAVF calculator →
FCPT
FCPT
● Live price
6.05%
Share price
$23.65
Annual div
$1.43
5Y div CAGR
15.8%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$49.1K
Annual income
$5,775.28
Full FCPT calculator →

Portfolio growth — LQAVF vs FCPT

📍 LQAVF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodLQAVFFCPT
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, LQAVF + FCPT cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan
—
Feb
—
Mar
—
Apr
—
May
—
Jun
—
Jul
—
Aug
—
Sep
—
Oct
—
Nov
—
Dec
—
LQAVF pays
FCPT pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

LQAVF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$170,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
FCPT
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$514.49/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,908.99/yr
At 15% tax rate, LQAVF beats the other by $4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of LQAVF + FCPT for your $10,000?

LQAVF: 50%FCPT: 50%
100% FCPT50/50100% LQAVF
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.439613200487403e+39M
Annual income
$2,439,373,269,665,485,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
99.99%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on FCPT right now

LQAVF
No analyst data
Altman Z
-35.9
Piotroski
2/9
FCPT
Analyst Ratings
5
Buy
10
Hold
Consensus: Hold
Price Target
$27.00
+14.2% upside vs current
Range: $25.00 — $29.00
Altman Z
1.4
Piotroski
6/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

LQAVF buys
0
FCPT buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for LQAVF or FCPT in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricLQAVFFCPT
Forward yield2000000.00% ✓6.05%
Annual dividend / share$2.00 ✓$1.43
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%15.8% ✓
Portfolio after 10y$4.879226400974806e+39M$49.1K ✓
Annual income after 10y$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓$5,775.28
Total dividends collected$4.879195005460081e+39M$24.1K ✓
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockREIT

Year-by-year: LQAVF vs FCPT ($10,000, DRIP)

YearLQAVF PortfolioLQAVF Income/yrFCPT PortfolioFCPT Income/yrGap
1← crossover$200,010,700$200,000,000.00$11,401$700.92+$200.00M → LQAVF
2$3,738,731,768,458$3,738,517,757,009.35$13,064$864.84+$3738731.76M → LQAVF
3$65,315,062,866,930,490$65,311,062,423,938,240.00$15,051$1,072.48+$65315062866.92M → LQAVF
4$1,066,400,830,062,625,000,000$1,066,330,942,945,357,500,000.00$17,442$1,337.22+$1066400830062625.00M → LQAVF
5$16,272,182,796,453,826,000,000,000$16,271,041,747,565,660,000,000,000.00$20,340$1,677.08+$16272182796453826560.00M → LQAVF
6$232,054,240,113,661,900,000,000,000,000$232,036,828,878,069,680,000,000,000,000.00$23,880$2,116.57+$2.3205424011366188e+23M → LQAVF
7$3,092,799,066,104,688,500,000,000,000,000,000$3,092,550,768,067,767,400,000,000,000,000,000.00$28,241$2,689.36+$3.0927990661046884e+27M → LQAVF
8$38,524,105,697,352,694,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$38,520,796,402,351,967,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$33,660$3,442.07+$3.8524105697352695e+31M → LQAVF
9$448,468,826,014,798,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$448,427,605,221,702,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$40,456$4,439.95+$4.484688260147987e+35M → LQAVF
10$4,879,226,400,974,806,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$49,063$5,775.28+$4.879226400974806e+39M → LQAVF

LQAVF vs FCPT: Complete Analysis 2026

LQAVF — Stock

Liquid Avatar Technologies Inc. operates as a blockchain and fintech solutions company, focuses on digital identity, integrated avatars, and the Metaverse worldwide. It develops and operates LAVCE that allows holders to create digital icons representing their online personas; LQID Card, a prepaid card program that allows to hold a digital payment method and earn cashback and other loyalty incentives; and KABN KASH, a cashback, loyalty, and engagement program. The company was formerly known as KABN Systems NA Holdings Corp. and changed its name to Liquid Avatar Technologies Inc. in March 2021. Liquid Avatar Technologies Inc. is headquartered in Markham, Canada.

Full LQAVF Calculator →

FCPT — REIT

FCPT, headquartered in Mill Valley, CA, is a real estate investment trust primarily engaged in the acquisition and leasing of restaurant properties. The Company seeks to grow its portfolio by acquiring additional real estate to lease, on a net basis, for use in the restaurant and retail industries.

Full FCPT Calculator →
📬

Get this LQAVF vs FCPT comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

LQAVF vs SCHDLQAVF vs JEPILQAVF vs OLQAVF vs KOLQAVF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.