Is MANVF or RYLD a better dividend investment in 2026?

MANVF currently yields 1333.33% with a 5% 5-year dividend growth rate. RYLD yields 12.14% with 5% growth. The better choice depends on your goal: MANVF offers higher current income.

What is the dividend yield difference between MANVF and RYLD?

MANVF has a forward dividend yield of 1333.33% ($2.00/share annually). RYLD yields 12.14% ($1.81/share annually). The yield gap is 1321.19 percentage points.

Home › Compare › MANVF vs RYLD

MANVF vs RYLD: Dividend Comparison 2026

MANVF yields 1333.33% · RYLD yields 12.14%● Live data

vsPost on X →

After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled

🏆 MANVF wins by $241528700.56M in total portfolio value

INVESTMENT

TIME HORIZON10 years

MANVF

● Live price

1333.33%

Share price

$0.15

Annual div

$2.00

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$241528700.61M

Annual income

$210,475,860,072,406.56

Full MANVF calculator →

RYLD

● Live price

12.14%

Share price

$14.95

Annual div

$1.81

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$44.5K

Annual income

$2,587.35

Full RYLD calculator →

Portfolio growth — MANVF vs RYLD

📍 MANVF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis Period	MANVF	RYLD
2008–2009 GFC	— No data	— No data
2020 Q1–Q2 COVID	— No data	— No data
2022 Q4 Rate Hike	— No data	— No data

Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.

📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, MANVF + RYLD cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan

—

Feb

—

Mar

—

Apr

—

May

—

Jun

—

Jul

—

Aug

—

Sep

—

Oct

—

Nov

—

Dec

—

MANVF pays

RYLD pays

Both pay

Neither

💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

MANVF

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$113,333.33/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$178,904,481,061,545.56/yr

RYLD

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$1,031.60/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$2,199.25/yr

At 15% tax rate, MANVF beats the other by $178,904,481,059,346.30/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000

⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of MANVF + RYLD for your $10,000?

MANVF: 50%RYLD: 50%

100% RYLD50/50100% MANVF

Portfolio after 10yr

$120764350.33M

Annual income

$105,237,930,037,496.95/yr

Blended yield

87.14%

🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

MANVF buys

RYLD buys

No recent congressional trades found for MANVF or RYLD in the last 90 days.

STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →

MetricMANVFRYLD

Forward yield	1333.33% ✓	12.14%
Annual dividend / share	$2.00 ✓	$1.81
Payout ratio	50%	50%
1-year div growth	0%	0%
5-year div CAGR	0%	0%
Portfolio after 10y	$241528700.61M ✓	$44.5K
Annual income after 10y	$210,475,860,072,406.56 ✓	$2,587.35
Total dividends collected	$239239876.27M ✓	$18.8K
Payment frequency	quarterly	quarterly
Sector	Stock	ETF

Year-by-year: MANVF vs RYLD ($10,000, DRIP)

Year	MANVF Portfolio	MANVF Income/yr	RYLD Portfolio	RYLD Income/yr	Gap
1← crossover	$144,033	$133,333.33	$11,914	$1,213.65	+$132.1K → MANVF
2	$1,948,924	$1,794,807.89	$14,099	$1,351.30	+$1.93M → MANVF
3	$24,782,219	$22,696,870.86	$16,580	$1,494.55	+$24.77M → MANVF
4	$296,245,945	$269,728,970.81	$19,384	$1,642.61	+$296.23M → MANVF
5	$3,330,378,004	$3,013,394,842.54	$22,535	$1,794.70	+$3330.36M → MANVF
6	$35,223,684,321	$31,660,179,856.69	$26,063	$1,950.00	+$35223.66M → MANVF
7	$350,636,384,108	$312,947,041,885.16	$29,995	$2,107.69	+$350636.35M → MANVF
8	$3,286,630,500,315	$2,911,449,569,318.85	$34,361	$2,266.99	+$3286630.47M → MANVF
9	$29,021,346,295,663	$25,504,651,660,325.88	$39,194	$2,427.12	+$29021346.26M → MANVF
10	$241,528,700,608,766	$210,475,860,072,406.56	$44,525	$2,587.35	+$241528700.56M → MANVF

MANVF vs RYLD: Complete Analysis 2026

MANVF — Stock

Manning Ventures Inc. engages in the sourcing and exploration of mineral properties in Canada. It primarily explores for gold, silver, lead, iron ore, zinc, cobalt, uranium, rare earth, and copper deposits. The company holds interest in the Flint Lake gold project, which includes 4 separate unpatented claims covering an area of approximately 1,712 hectares located in Kenora town, northwestern Ontario. It also holds interest in the Lac Simone property, which consists of 63 mineral claims covering an area of approximately 3,287.4 hectares; and the Hope Lake property which includes 68 mineral claims covering an area of approximately 3,584.1 hectares. In addition, the has an option to acquire a 100% interest in the Broken Lake, Heart Lake, and Hydro properties that consist of 180 mineral claims covering an area of 9,501 hectares located in the Province of Quebec; and the Bounty lithium project comprises 144 mineral claims totaling 7,544 hectares. Further, it holds interest in Butterfly Pond property covering an area of 425 hectares, Mount Hogan property which covers an area of 250 hectares, Red Indian Lake property covering an area of 9,300 hectares, and Little Sheep Brook property covering an area of 700 hectares located in Newfoundland, Canada. Manning Ventures Inc. was incorporated in 2018 and is based in Vancouver, Canada.

Full MANVF Calculator →

RYLD — ETF

The Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index.

Full RYLD Calculator →

📬

Get this MANVF vs RYLD comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

MANVF vs SCHD MANVF vs JEPI MANVF vs O MANVF vs KO MANVF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.