HomeCompareMCCX vs YUM

MCCX vs YUM: Dividend Comparison 2026

MCCX yields 16666.67% · YUM yields 1.85%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 MCCX wins by $8601297707047409664.00M in total portfolio value
10 years
MCCX
MCCX
● Live price
16666.67%
Share price
$0.01
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$8601297707047409664.00M
Annual income
$8,500,961,637,704,150,000,000,000.00
Full MCCX calculator →
YUM
YUM
● Live price
1.85%
Share price
$155.48
Annual div
$2.88
5Y div CAGR
51.4%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$107.0K
Annual income
$39,957.33
Full YUM calculator →

Portfolio growth — MCCX vs YUM

📍 MCCX pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodMCCXYUM
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, MCCX + YUM cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
MCCX pays
YUM pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

MCCX
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$1,416,666.67/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$7,225,817,392,048,527,000,000,000.00/yr
YUM
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$157.45/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$33,963.73/yr
At 15% tax rate, MCCX beats the other by $7,225,817,392,048,527,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of MCCX + YUM for your $10,000?

MCCX: 50%YUM: 50%
100% YUM50/50100% MCCX
Portfolio after 10yr
$4300648853523704832.00M
Annual income
$4,250,480,818,852,075,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
98.83%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on YUM right now

MCCX
No analyst data
Altman Z
-228.4
Piotroski
2/9
YUM
Analyst Ratings
18
Buy
30
Hold
3
Sell
Consensus: Hold
Price Target
$173.15
+11.4% upside vs current
Range: $158.00 — $190.00
Altman Z
2.6
Piotroski
6/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

MCCX buys
0
YUM buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for MCCX or YUM in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricMCCXYUM
Forward yield16666.67%1.85%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$2.88
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%51.4%
Portfolio after 10y$8601297707047409664.00M$107.0K
Annual income after 10y$8,500,961,637,704,150,000,000,000.00$39,957.33
Total dividends collected$8594666089931243520.00M$80.4K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockConsumer Discretionary

Year-by-year: MCCX vs YUM ($10,000, DRIP)

YearMCCX PortfolioMCCX Income/yrYUM PortfolioYUM Income/yrGap
1← crossover$1,677,367$1,666,666.67$10,980$280.44+$1.67MMCCX
2$263,066,849$261,272,066.46$12,185$435.72+$263.05MMCCX
3$38,576,943,838$38,295,462,310.00$13,722$684.14+$38576.93MMCCX
4$5,289,656,888,585$5,248,379,558,677.81$15,773$1,090.14+$5289656.87MMCCX
5$678,235,585,150,030$672,575,652,279,244.40$18,650$1,773.02+$678235585.13MMCCX
6$81,321,145,183,775,540$80,595,433,107,665,010.00$22,921$2,966.37+$81321145183.75MMCCX
7$9,118,299,079,523,715,000$9,031,285,454,177,076,000.00$29,685$5,158.69+$9118299079523.69MMCCX
8$956,159,646,381,740,000,000$946,403,066,366,649,700,000.00$41,216$9,453.02+$956159646381740.00MMCCX
9$93,772,027,423,605,150,000,000$92,748,936,601,976,690,000,000.00$62,672$18,571.31+$93772027423605152.00MMCCX
10$8,601,297,707,047,409,000,000,000$8,500,961,637,704,150,000,000,000.00$107,016$39,957.33+$8601297707047409664.00MMCCX

MCCX vs YUM: Complete Analysis 2026

MCCXStock

MCX Technologies Corporation focuses on delivering digital transformation solutions to customer-centric organizations through integrated marketing, data science, and commerce in the United States. It offers professional and related consulting services, including brand strategy, pricing science, data science, digital transformation, customer experience management consulting, implementation, and go-to-market execution in support of these strategies. The company was formerly known as McorpCX, Inc. and changed its name to MCX Technologies Corporation in August 2020. MCX Technologies Corporation was incorporated in 2001 and is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.

Full MCCX Calculator →

YUMConsumer Discretionary

YUM! Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops, operates, and franchises quick service restaurants worldwide. It operates through four segments: the KFC Division, the Taco Bell Division, the Pizza Hut Division, and the Habit Burger Grill Division. The company operates restaurants under the KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, and The Habit Burger Grill brands, which specialize in chicken, pizza, made-to-order chargrilled burgers, sandwiches, Mexican-style food categories, and other food products. As of December 31, 2021, it had 26,934 KFC units; 18,381 Pizza Hut units; 7,791 Taco Bell units; and 318 The Habit Burger Grill units in approximately 157 countries and territories. The company was formerly known as TRICON Global Restaurants, Inc. and changed its name to YUM! Brands, Inc. in May 2002. YUM! Brands, Inc. was incorporated in 1997 and is headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky.

Full YUM Calculator →
📬

Get this MCCX vs YUM comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

MCCX vs SCHDMCCX vs JEPIMCCX vs OMCCX vs KOMCCX vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.