Home › Compare › NTGL vs EQR

NTGL vs EQR: Dividend Comparison 2026

NTGL yields 2000000.00% · EQR yields 5.87%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 NTGL wins by $4.879226400974806e+39M in total portfolio value
10 years
NTGL
NTGL
● Live price
2000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.879226400974806e+39M
Annual income
$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full NTGL calculator →
EQR
EQR
● Live price
5.87%
Share price
$59.15
Annual div
$3.47
5Y div CAGR
15.8%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$47.8K
Annual income
$5,475.61
Full EQR calculator →

Portfolio growth — NTGL vs EQR

📍 NTGL pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodNTGLEQR
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, NTGL + EQR cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan
—
Feb
—
Mar
—
Apr
—
May
—
Jun
—
Jul
—
Aug
—
Sep
—
Oct
—
Nov
—
Dec
—
NTGL pays
EQR pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

NTGL
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$170,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
EQR
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$499.01/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,654.27/yr
At 15% tax rate, NTGL beats the other by $4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of NTGL + EQR for your $10,000?

NTGL: 50%EQR: 50%
100% EQR50/50100% NTGL
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.439613200487403e+39M
Annual income
$2,439,373,269,665,485,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
99.99%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on EQR right now

NTGL
No analyst data
EQR
Analyst Ratings
16
Buy
28
Hold
2
Sell
Consensus: Hold
Price Target
$70.35
+18.9% upside vs current
Range: $63.00 — $78.50
Altman Z
1.8
Piotroski
7/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

NTGL buys
0
EQR buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for NTGL or EQR in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricNTGLEQR
Forward yield2000000.00% ✓5.87%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$3.47 ✓
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%15.8% ✓
Portfolio after 10y$4.879226400974806e+39M$47.8K ✓
Annual income after 10y$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓$5,475.61
Total dividends collected$4.879195005460081e+39M$23.0K ✓
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockREIT

Year-by-year: NTGL vs EQR ($10,000, DRIP)

YearNTGL PortfolioNTGL Income/yrEQR PortfolioEQR Income/yrGap
1← crossover$200,010,700$200,000,000.00$11,380$679.82+$200.00M → NTGL
2$3,738,731,768,458$3,738,517,757,009.35$13,014$837.25+$3738731.76M → NTGL
3$65,315,062,866,930,490$65,311,062,423,938,240.00$14,961$1,036.20+$65315062866.92M → NTGL
4$1,066,400,830,062,625,000,000$1,066,330,942,945,357,500,000.00$17,297$1,289.22+$1066400830062625.00M → NTGL
5$16,272,182,796,453,826,000,000,000$16,271,041,747,565,660,000,000,000.00$20,121$1,613.15+$16272182796453826560.00M → NTGL
6$232,054,240,113,661,900,000,000,000,000$232,036,828,878,069,680,000,000,000,000.00$23,561$2,030.84+$2.3205424011366188e+23M → NTGL
7$3,092,799,066,104,688,500,000,000,000,000,000$3,092,550,768,067,767,400,000,000,000,000,000.00$27,783$2,573.54+$3.0927990661046884e+27M → NTGL
8$38,524,105,697,352,694,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$38,520,796,402,351,967,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$33,013$3,284.39+$3.8524105697352695e+31M → NTGL
9$448,468,826,014,798,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$448,427,605,221,702,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$39,547$4,223.51+$4.484688260147987e+35M → NTGL
10$4,879,226,400,974,806,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$47,791$5,475.61+$4.879226400974806e+39M → NTGL

NTGL vs EQR: Complete Analysis 2026

NTGL — Stock

NanoTech Gaming, Inc. develops gaming products in the United States. It creates gaming experiences using patent pending math models and non-traditional designs in the land-based casino and arcade gaming markets. It offers gaming products to traditional players and gamblers. The company was formerly known as High Velocity Enterprises, Inc. and changed its name to NanoTech Gaming, Inc. in April 2015. The company was founded in 1989 and is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada. As of February 2, 2015, NanoTech Gaming, Inc. operates as a subsidiary of NanoTech Entertainment, Inc.

Full NTGL Calculator →

EQR — REIT

Equity Residential is committed to creating communities where people thrive. The Company, a member of the S&P 500, is focused on the acquisition, development and management of residential properties located in and around dynamic cities that attract high quality long-term renters. Equity Residential owns or has investments in 305 properties consisting of 78,568 apartment units, located in Boston, New York, Washington, D.C., Seattle, San Francisco, Southern California and Denver.

Full EQR Calculator →
📬

Get this NTGL vs EQR comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

NTGL vs SCHDNTGL vs JEPINTGL vs ONTGL vs KONTGL vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.