HomeComparePPA vs JEPQ

PPA vs JEPQ: Dividend Comparison 2026

PPA yields 0.40% · JEPQ yields 11.47%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 JEPQ wins by $25.6K in total portfolio value
10 years
PPA
PPA
● Live price
0.40%
Share price
$165.70
Annual div
$0.66
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$20.2K
Annual income
$40.63
Full PPA calculator →
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
● Live price
11.47%
Share price
$53.77
Annual div
$6.16
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$45.8K
Annual income
$2,269.18
Full JEPQ calculator →

Portfolio growth — PPA vs JEPQ

📍 JEPQ pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodPPAJEPQ
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, PPA + JEPQ cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
PPA pays
JEPQ pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

PPA
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$33.66/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$34.54/yr
JEPQ
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$974.55/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$1,928.80/yr
At 15% tax rate, JEPQ beats the other by $1,894.27/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of PPA + JEPQ for your $10,000?

PPA: 50%JEPQ: 50%
100% JEPQ50/50100% PPA
Portfolio after 10yr
$33.0K
Annual income
$1,154.90/yr
Blended yield
3.50%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is split right now

PPA
Analyst Ratings
1
Hold
Consensus: Hold
JEPQ
No analyst data
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

PPA buys
0
JEPQ buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for PPA or JEPQ in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricPPAJEPQ
Forward yield0.40%11.47%
Annual dividend / share$0.66$6.16
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%0%
Portfolio after 10y$20.2K$45.8K
Annual income after 10y$40.63$2,269.18
Total dividends collected$402.00$17.1K
Payment frequencyquarterlymonthly
SectorStockETF

Year-by-year: PPA vs JEPQ ($10,000, DRIP)

YearPPA PortfolioPPA Income/yrJEPQ PortfolioJEPQ Income/yrGap
1← crossover$10,740$39.59$11,967$1,146.53$1.2KJEPQ
2$11,531$39.74$14,216$1,268.02$2.7KJEPQ
3$12,378$39.88$16,774$1,392.20$4.4KJEPQ
4$13,285$40.01$19,667$1,518.21$6.4KJEPQ
5$14,255$40.13$22,925$1,645.21$8.7KJEPQ
6$15,293$40.24$26,578$1,772.40$11.3KJEPQ
7$16,404$40.35$30,656$1,899.04$14.3KJEPQ
8$17,592$40.45$35,194$2,024.45$17.6KJEPQ
9$18,864$40.54$40,228$2,148.01$21.4KJEPQ
10$20,225$40.63$45,796$2,269.18$25.6KJEPQ

PPA vs JEPQ: Complete Analysis 2026

PPAStock

The Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (Fund) is based on the SPADE Defense Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to identify a group of companies involved in the development, manufacturing, operations and support of US defense, homeland security and aerospace operations. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly. As of 08/31/2025 the Fund had an overall rating of 5 stars out of 46 funds and was rated 5 stars out of 46 funds, 5 stars out of 42 funds and 5 stars out of 33 funds for the 3-, 5- and 10- year periods, respectively. Source: Morningstar Inc. Ratings are based on a risk-adjusted return measure that accounts for variation in a fund's monthly performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. Open-end mutual funds and exchange-traded funds are considered a single population for comparison purposes. Ratings are calculated for funds with at least a three year history. The overall rating is derived from a weighted average of three-, five- and 10-year rating metrics, as applicable, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses. ©2025 Morningstar Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The top 10% of funds in a category receive five stars, the next 22.5% four stars, the next 35% three stars, the next 22.5% two stars and the bottom 10% one star. Ratings are subject to change monthly. Had fees not been waived and/or expenses reimbursed currently or in the past, the Morningstar rating would have been lower. Ratings for other share classes may differ due to different performance characteristics.

Full PPA Calculator →

JEPQETF

The fund seeks to achieve this objective by (1) creating an actively managed portfolio of equity securities comprised significantly of those included in the fund’s primary benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index (the Benchmark), and (2) through equity-linked notes (ELNs), selling call options with exposure to the Benchmark. It is non-diversified.

Full JEPQ Calculator →
📬

Get this PPA vs JEPQ comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

PPA vs SCHDPPA vs JEPIPPA vs OPPA vs KOPPA vs MAINPPA vs XYLDPPA vs QYLDPPA vs VYM

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.