HomeCompareSGLRF vs JEPQ

SGLRF vs JEPQ: Dividend Comparison 2026

SGLRF yields 20000000.00% · JEPQ yields 11.10%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 SGLRF wins by $1.6749413722022386e+46M in total portfolio value
10 years
SGLRF
SGLRF
● Live price
20000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
-13.5%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$1.6749413722022386e+46M
Annual income
$16,748,711,251,504,588,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full SGLRF calculator →
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
● Live price
11.10%
Share price
$55.52
Annual div
$6.16
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$44.8K
Annual income
$2,152.59
Full JEPQ calculator →

Portfolio growth — SGLRF vs JEPQ

📍 SGLRF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodSGLRFJEPQ
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, SGLRF + JEPQ cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
SGLRF pays
JEPQ pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

SGLRF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$1,700,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$14,236,404,563,778,900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
JEPQ
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$943.83/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$1,829.70/yr
At 15% tax rate, SGLRF beats the other by $14,236,404,563,778,900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of SGLRF + JEPQ for your $10,000?

SGLRF: 50%JEPQ: 50%
100% JEPQ50/50100% SGLRF
Portfolio after 10yr
$8.374706861011193e+45M
Annual income
$8,374,355,625,752,294,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
100.00%
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

SGLRF buys
0
JEPQ buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for SGLRF or JEPQ in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricSGLRFJEPQ
Forward yield20000000.00%11.10%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$6.16
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR-13.5%0%
Portfolio after 10y$1.6749413722022386e+46M$44.8K
Annual income after 10y$16,748,711,251,504,588,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$2,152.59
Total dividends collected$1.6749367764550958e+46M$16.3K
Payment frequencyquarterlymonthly
SectorStockETF

Year-by-year: SGLRF vs JEPQ ($10,000, DRIP)

YearSGLRF PortfolioSGLRF Income/yrJEPQ PortfolioJEPQ Income/yrGap
1← crossover$1,730,010,700$1,730,000,000.00$11,930$1,110.39+$1730.00MSGLRF
2$241,952,740,084,813$241,950,888,973,364.40$14,133$1,224.34+$241952740.07MSGLRF
3$27,355,547,900,125,400,000$27,355,289,010,693,510,000.00$16,632$1,340.46+$27355547900125.38MSGLRF
4$2,500,308,482,612,406,000,000,000$2,500,279,212,176,153,000,000,000.00$19,454$1,457.97+$2500308482612406272.00MSGLRF
5$184,746,111,257,018,130,000,000,000,000$184,743,435,926,941,720,000,000,000,000.00$22,626$1,576.08+$1.847461112570181e+23MSGLRF
6$11,035,470,070,930,600,000,000,000,000,000,000$11,035,272,392,591,556,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$26,175$1,694.09+$1.10354700709306e+28MSGLRF
7$532,893,646,515,316,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$532,881,838,562,340,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$30,133$1,811.32+$5.3289364651531656e+32MSGLRF
8$20,802,946,771,498,614,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$20,802,376,575,296,843,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$34,531$1,927.17+$2.0802946771498615e+37MSGLRF
9$656,514,502,613,156,300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$656,492,243,460,110,760,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$39,403$2,041.08+$6.565145026131563e+41MSGLRF
10$16,749,413,722,022,386,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$16,748,711,251,504,588,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$44,787$2,152.59+$1.6749413722022386e+46MSGLRF

SGLRF vs JEPQ: Complete Analysis 2026

SGLRFStock

Spyglass Resources Corp., an intermediate oil and gas company, operates oil and natural gas properties in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. The company's principal properties are located in Dixonville, Enchant, Retlaw, Matziwin, and Halkirk-Provost in Alberta; and Noel, British Columbia. As of December 31, 2014, it had proved plus probable reserves of 54,129 Mboe. The company was formerly known as Pace Oil & Gas Ltd. and changed its name to Spyglass Resources Corp. in March 2013, as result of its amalgamation with Charger Energy Corp. and AvenEx Energy Corp. Spyglass Resources Corp. is headquartered in Calgary, Canada. On November 26, 2015, syndicate of lenders filed an involuntary petition against Spyglass Resources Corp. in the Court of Queen's Bench of Albert. The Court approved the involuntary petition on November 26, 2015.

Full SGLRF Calculator →

JEPQETF

The fund seeks to achieve this objective by (1) creating an actively managed portfolio of equity securities comprised significantly of those included in the fund’s primary benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index (the Benchmark), and (2) through equity-linked notes (ELNs), selling call options with exposure to the Benchmark. It is non-diversified.

Full JEPQ Calculator →
📬

Get this SGLRF vs JEPQ comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

SGLRF vs SCHDSGLRF vs JEPISGLRF vs OSGLRF vs KOSGLRF vs MAINSGLRF vs XYLDSGLRF vs QYLDSGLRF vs VYM

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.