HomeCompareSM vs CQP

SM vs CQP: Dividend Comparison 2026

SM yields 2.55% · CQP yields 4.92%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 SM wins by $191.49M in total portfolio value· pulled ahead in Year 2
10 years
SM
SM
● Live price
2.55%
Share price
$32.13
Annual div
$0.82
5Y div CAGR
100%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$191.56M
Annual income
$178,145,793.19
Full SM calculator →
CQP
CQP
● Live price
4.92%
Share price
$67.12
Annual div
$3.30
5Y div CAGR
25.3%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$65.7K
Annual income
$12,645.22
Full CQP calculator →

Portfolio growth — SM vs CQP

📍 SM pulled ahead of the other in Year 2

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodSMCQP
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, SM + CQP cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
SM pays
CQP pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

SM
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$216.93/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$151,423,924.21/yr
CQP
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$417.91/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$10,748.44/yr
At 15% tax rate, SM beats the other by $151,413,175.77/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of SM + CQP for your $10,000?

SM: 50%CQP: 50%
100% CQP50/50100% SM
Portfolio after 10yr
$95.81M
Annual income
$89,079,219.21/yr
Blended yield
92.97%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on SM right now

SM
Analyst Ratings
31
Buy
17
Hold
5
Sell
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$29.00
-9.7% upside vs current
Range: $19.00 — $49.00
Altman Z
1.7
Piotroski
6/9
CQP
Analyst Ratings
3
Buy
5
Hold
10
Sell
Consensus: Sell
Price Target
$47.50
-29.2% upside vs current
Range: $44.00 — $55.00
Altman Z
2.4
Piotroski
7/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

SM buys
1
CQP buys
0
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
Chris Jacobs🏢 House$SM▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002022-07-18
Chris Jacobs🏢 House$SM▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002022-04-11
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricSMCQP
Forward yield2.55%4.92%
Annual dividend / share$0.82$3.30
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR100%25.3%
Portfolio after 10y$191.56M$65.7K
Annual income after 10y$178,145,793.19$12,645.22
Total dividends collected$190.53M$39.5K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorEnergyStock
Analyst consensusBuySell
Analyst price target$29.00$47.50

Year-by-year: SM vs CQP ($10,000, DRIP)

YearSM PortfolioSM Income/yrCQP PortfolioCQP Income/yrGap
1$11,210$510.43$11,316$616.05$106.00CQP
2← crossover$13,065$1,069.55$12,925$816.35+$140.00SM
3$16,309$2,329.84$14,921$1,091.85+$1.4KSM
4$22,887$5,436.27$17,442$1,476.10+$5.4KSM
5$38,749$14,259.57$20,683$2,020.55+$18.1KSM
6$86,586$45,125.35$24,937$2,805.86+$61.6KSM
7$281,125$188,477.75$30,644$3,961.48+$250.5KSM
8$1,444,621$1,143,816.65$38,490$5,700.69+$1.41MSM
9$12,532,176$10,986,431.99$49,569$8,384.84+$12.48MSM
10$191,555,222$178,145,793.19$65,684$12,645.22+$191.49MSM

SM vs CQP: Complete Analysis 2026

SMEnergy

SM Energy Company, an independent energy company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the state of Texas. As of February 24, 2022, it had 492.0 million barrels of oil equivalent of estimated proved reserves. It also has working interests in 825 gross productive oil wells and 483 gross productive gas wells in the Midland Basin and South Texas. The company was formerly known as St. Mary Land & Exploration Company and changed its name to SM Energy Company in May 2010. SM Energy Company was founded in 1908 and is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Full SM Calculator →

CQPStock

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P., through its subsidiaries, owns and operates natural gas liquefaction and export facility at the Sabine Pass liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana. The company's regasification facilities include five LNG storage tanks with an aggregate capacity of approximately 17 billion cubic feet equivalent; two marine berths that accommodate vessels with capacity of up to 266,000 cubic meters; and vaporizers with regasification capacity of approximately 4 billion cubic feet per day. It also owns a 94-mile pipeline that interconnects the Sabine Pass LNG terminal with various interstate pipelines. Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC serves as the general partner of the company. The company was founded in 2003 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Full CQP Calculator →
📬

Get this SM vs CQP comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

SM vs SCHDSM vs JEPISM vs OSM vs KOSM vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.