Home › Compare › SMBZF vs VYM

SMBZF vs VYM: Dividend Comparison 2026

SMBZF yields 20000000.00% · VYM yields 2.41%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 SMBZF wins by $4.875981653489057e+49M in total portfolio value
10 years
SMBZF
SMBZF
● Live price
20000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.875981653489057e+49M
Annual income
$48,759,336,949,911,260,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full SMBZF calculator →
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
● Live price
2.41%
Share price
$145.48
Annual div
$3.51
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$27.8K
Annual income
$278.55
Full VYM calculator →

Portfolio growth — SMBZF vs VYM

📍 SMBZF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodSMBZFVYM
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, SMBZF + VYM cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan
—
Feb
—
Mar
—
Apr
—
May
—
Jun
—
Jul
—
Aug
—
Sep
—
Oct
—
Nov
—
Dec
—
SMBZF pays
VYM pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

SMBZF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$1,700,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$41,445,436,407,424,570,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
VYM
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$205.23/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$236.77/yr
At 15% tax rate, SMBZF beats the other by $41,445,436,407,424,570,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of SMBZF + VYM for your $10,000?

SMBZF: 50%VYM: 50%
100% VYM50/50100% SMBZF
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.4379908267445285e+49M
Annual income
$24,379,668,474,955,630,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
100.00%
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

SMBZF buys
0
VYM buys
1
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
Carol Devine Miller🏢 House$VYM▲ Buy$15,001 - $50,0002022-11-02
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricSMBZFVYM
Forward yield20000000.00% ✓2.41%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$3.51 ✓
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%0%
Portfolio after 10y$4.875981653489057e+49M$27.8K ✓
Annual income after 10y$48,759,336,949,911,260,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓$278.55
Total dividends collected$4.875978515990276e+49M ✓$2.6K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockETF

Year-by-year: SMBZF vs VYM ($10,000, DRIP)

YearSMBZF PortfolioSMBZF Income/yrVYM PortfolioVYM Income/yrGap
1← crossover$2,000,010,700$2,000,000,000.00$11,151$241.44+$2000.00M → SMBZF
2$373,835,915,712,384$373,833,775,700,934.50$12,413$246.79+$373835915.70M → SMBZF
3$65,304,953,364,964,970,000$65,304,553,360,535,160,000.00$13,794$251.79+$65304953364964.95M → SMBZF
4$10,661,728,832,755,500,000,000,000$10,661,658,956,455,399,000,000,000.00$15,306$256.47+$10661728832755499008.00M → SMBZF
5$1,626,767,783,781,495,000,000,000,000,000$1,626,756,375,731,643,800,000,000,000,000.00$16,960$260.84+$1.626767783781495e+24M → SMBZF
6$231,974,330,054,625,100,000,000,000,000,000,000$231,972,589,413,096,470,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$18,768$264.92+$2.319743300546251e+29M → SMBZF
7$30,915,106,403,922,057,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$30,914,858,191,388,900,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$20,745$268.71+$3.0915106403922057e+34M → SMBZF
8$3,850,507,985,839,278,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$3,850,474,906,675,425,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$22,905$272.24+$3.8505079858392777e+39M → SMBZF
9$448,210,261,035,314,200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$448,206,140,991,769,400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$25,265$275.51+$4.4821026103531426e+44M → SMBZF
10$48,759,816,534,890,570,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$48,759,336,949,911,260,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$27,842$278.55+$4.875981653489057e+49M → SMBZF

SMBZF vs VYM: Complete Analysis 2026

SMBZF — Stock

Simba Essel Energy Inc. acquires, explores, and develops oil and gas properties in Africa. It owns interests in the production sharing contract for Block 2A that covers an area of 7,802 square kilometers located in Mandera Basin, Northeast Kenya; Blocks 1 and 2 comprising 12,000 square kilometers located onshore in Bove basin, Guinea; hydrocarbon reconnaissance license, which covers an area of approximately 1,366 square kilometers located in onshore area in Liberia; and three oil and gas blocks in the Doba, Doseo, and Erdis basins, Chad. The company was formerly known as Simba Energy Inc. and changed its name to Simba Essel Energy Inc. in April 2017. Simba Essel Energy Inc. was incorporated in 2010 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Full SMBZF Calculator →

VYM — ETF

Seeks to track the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which measures the investment return of common stocks of companies characterized by high dividend yields. Provides a convenient way to track the performance of stocks that are forecasted to have above-average dividend yields. Follows a passively managed, full-replication approach.

Full VYM Calculator →
📬

Get this SMBZF vs VYM comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

SMBZF vs SCHDSMBZF vs JEPISMBZF vs OSMBZF vs KOSMBZF vs MAINSMBZF vs VIGSMBZF vs DGROSMBZF vs HDV

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.