HomeCompareSMRVF vs PLD

SMRVF vs PLD: Dividend Comparison 2026

SMRVF yields 645.99% · PLD yields 3.10%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 SMRVF wins by $470104.78M in total portfolio value
10 years
SMRVF
SMRVF
● Live price
645.99%
Share price
$0.31
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$470110.68M
Annual income
$360,371,994,850.78
Full SMRVF calculator →
PLD
PLD
● Live price
3.10%
Share price
$132.18
Annual div
$4.10
5Y div CAGR
74.4%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$5.91M
Annual income
$4,750,725.19
Full PLD calculator →

Portfolio growth — SMRVF vs PLD

📍 SMRVF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodSMRVFPLD
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, SMRVF + PLD cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
SMRVF pays
PLD pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

SMRVF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$54,909.56/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$306,316,195,623.16/yr
PLD
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$263.66/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,038,116.41/yr
At 15% tax rate, SMRVF beats the other by $306,312,157,506.75/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of SMRVF + PLD for your $10,000?

SMRVF: 50%PLD: 50%
100% PLD50/50100% SMRVF
Portfolio after 10yr
$235058.30M
Annual income
$180,188,372,787.98/yr
Blended yield
76.66%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on PLD right now

SMRVF
No analyst data
Altman Z
-26.7
Piotroski
1/9
PLD
Analyst Ratings
25
Buy
16
Hold
1
Sell
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$136.00
+2.9% upside vs current
Range: $119.00 — $155.00
Altman Z
1.9
Piotroski
5/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

SMRVF buys
0
PLD buys
13
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-02-26
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-29
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002026-01-16
Ro Khanna🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-26
Dan Newhouse🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-18
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-14
David Taylor🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-07
Shelley Moore Capito🏛 Senate$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-01
Shelley Moore Capito🏛 Senate$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-08-01
Thomas H. Kean🏢 House$PLD▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002025-06-30
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricSMRVFPLD
Forward yield645.99%3.10%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$4.10
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%74.4%
Portfolio after 10y$470110.68M$5.91M
Annual income after 10y$360,371,994,850.78$4,750,725.19
Total dividends collected$461087.43M$5.78M
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockREIT

Year-by-year: SMRVF vs PLD ($10,000, DRIP)

YearSMRVF PortfolioSMRVF Income/yrPLD PortfolioPLD Income/yrGap
1← crossover$75,299$64,599.48$11,241$540.96+$64.1KSMRVF
2$535,179$454,608.20$13,019$991.13+$522.2KSMRVF
3$3,592,317$3,019,675.41$15,801$1,870.97+$3.58MSMRVF
4$22,786,934$18,943,154.91$20,609$3,701.21+$22.77MSMRVF
5$136,682,036$112,300,016.57$29,919$7,867.97+$136.65MSMRVF
6$775,787,261$629,537,482.79$50,631$18,617.74+$775.74MSMRVF
7$4,169,496,817$3,339,404,448.29$105,528$51,352.20+$4169.39MSMRVF
8$21,234,960,217$16,773,598,622.85$287,364$174,449.42+$21234.67MSMRVF
9$102,559,522,301$79,838,114,868.46$1,081,760$774,280.77+$102558.44MSMRVF
10$470,110,683,713$360,371,994,850.78$5,908,209$4,750,725.19+$470104.78MSMRVF

SMRVF vs PLD: Complete Analysis 2026

SMRVFStock

Smooth Rock Ventures Corp. engages in the acquisition, exploration, and evaluation of mineral properties. The company has a 100% undivided interest in 28 unpatented mining claims with a combined area of 226 hectares in the Chucker Project located in the Silver Star Mining District, within Mineral County, Nevada. It also has an option to purchase agreement to acquire a 100% undivided interest in Palmetto Project comprising of 79 unpatented mining claims totaling 1600 acres in Esmeralda County, Nevada. In addition, the company has an option to purchase agreement to acquire a Giroux Project consisting of 12 patented claims located in southeast of Hawthorne; and option to acquire Garfield Flats property located in Mineral County, Nevada. Smooth Rock Ventures Corp. was incorporated in 1966 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Full SMRVF Calculator →

PLDREIT

Prologis, Inc. is the global leader in logistics real estate with a focus on high-barrier, high-growth markets. As of December 31, 2020, the company owned or had investments in, on a wholly owned basis or through co-investment ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately 984 million square feet (91 million square meters) in 19 countries. Prologis leases modern logistics facilities to a diverse base of approximately 5,500 customers principally across two major categories: business-to-business and retail/online fulfillment.

Full PLD Calculator →
📬

Get this SMRVF vs PLD comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

SMRVF vs SCHDSMRVF vs JEPISMRVF vs OSMRVF vs KOSMRVF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.