Home › Compare › SPIEF vs QYLD

SPIEF vs QYLD: Dividend Comparison 2026

SPIEF yields 2000000.00% · QYLD yields 11.92%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 SPIEF wins by $4.879226400974806e+39M in total portfolio value
10 years
SPIEF
SPIEF
● Live price
2000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.879226400974806e+39M
Annual income
$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full SPIEF calculator →
QYLD
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
● Live price
11.92%
Share price
$17.15
Annual div
$2.04
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$25.4K
Annual income
$5,659.31
Full QYLD calculator →

Portfolio growth — SPIEF vs QYLD

📍 SPIEF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodSPIEFQYLD
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, SPIEF + QYLD cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan
—
Feb
—
Mar
—
Apr
—
May
—
Jun
—
Jul
—
Aug
—
Sep
—
Oct
—
Nov
—
Dec
—
SPIEF pays
QYLD pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

SPIEF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$170,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
QYLD
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$1,013.51/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,810.41/yr
At 15% tax rate, SPIEF beats the other by $4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of SPIEF + QYLD for your $10,000?

SPIEF: 50%QYLD: 50%
100% QYLD50/50100% SPIEF
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.439613200487403e+39M
Annual income
$2,439,373,269,665,485,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
99.99%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on SPIEF right now

SPIEF
Analyst Ratings
1
Buy
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$7.00
+6999900.0% upside vs current
Range: $7.00 — $7.00
Altman Z
-3.9
Piotroski
4/9
QYLD
No analyst data
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

SPIEF buys
0
QYLD buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for SPIEF or QYLD in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricSPIEFQYLD
Forward yield2000000.00% ✓11.92%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$2.04 ✓
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%0%
Portfolio after 10y$4.879226400974806e+39M$25.4K ✓
Annual income after 10y$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓$5,659.31
Total dividends collected$4.879195005460081e+39M$27.1K ✓
Payment frequencyquarterlymonthly
SectorStockETF

Year-by-year: SPIEF vs QYLD ($10,000, DRIP)

YearSPIEF PortfolioSPIEF Income/yrQYLD PortfolioQYLD Income/yrGap
1← crossover$200,010,700$200,000,000.00$10,352$1,192.36+$200.00M → SPIEF
2$3,738,731,768,458$3,738,517,757,009.35$10,830$1,347.57+$3738731.76M → SPIEF
3$65,315,062,866,930,490$65,311,062,423,938,240.00$11,460$1,539.07+$65315062866.92M → SPIEF
4$1,066,400,830,062,625,000,000$1,066,330,942,945,357,500,000.00$12,275$1,777.84+$1066400830062625.00M → SPIEF
5$16,272,182,796,453,826,000,000,000$16,271,041,747,565,660,000,000,000.00$13,323$2,078.95+$16272182796453826560.00M → SPIEF
6$232,054,240,113,661,900,000,000,000,000$232,036,828,878,069,680,000,000,000,000.00$14,667$2,463.34+$2.3205424011366188e+23M → SPIEF
7$3,092,799,066,104,688,500,000,000,000,000,000$3,092,550,768,067,767,400,000,000,000,000,000.00$16,396$2,960.57+$3.0927990661046884e+27M → SPIEF
8$38,524,105,697,352,694,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$38,520,796,402,351,967,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$18,631$3,612.97+$3.8524105697352695e+31M → SPIEF
9$448,468,826,014,798,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$448,427,605,221,702,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$21,548$4,482.15+$4.484688260147987e+35M → SPIEF
10$4,879,226,400,974,806,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$25,398$5,659.31+$4.879226400974806e+39M → SPIEF

SPIEF vs QYLD: Complete Analysis 2026

SPIEF — Stock

SPI Energy Co., Ltd. operates as a renewable energy company in North America, Australia, Asia, and Europe. The company offers solar storage and module; renewable energy system solutions to residential and small commercial markets; and EPC services to third party project developers, as well as develops, owns, and operates solar projects that sell electricity to the grid. It also provides commercial electric vehicles, EV charger solutions, electric pickup trucks and scooters, and other EV products. The company was formerly known as Solar Power, Inc. and changed its name to SPI Energy Co., Ltd. in January 2016. SPI Energy Co., Ltd. was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Sacramento, California.

Full SPIEF Calculator →

QYLD — ETF

The Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index.

Full QYLD Calculator →
📬

Get this SPIEF vs QYLD comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

SPIEF vs SCHDSPIEF vs JEPISPIEF vs OSPIEF vs KOSPIEF vs MAINSPIEF vs XYLDSPIEF vs JEPQSPIEF vs RYLD

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.