HomeCompareSPR vs SCHD

SPR vs SCHD: Dividend Comparison 2026

SPR yields 5.06% · SCHD yields 3.46%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 SCHD wins by $8.5K in total portfolio value
10 years
SPR
SPR
● Live price
5.06%
Share price
$39.50
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
-50%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$20.6K
Annual income
$0.52
Full SPR calculator →
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
● Live price
3.46%
Share price
$30.48
Annual div
$1.06
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$29.0K
Annual income
$425.95
Full SCHD calculator →

Portfolio growth — SPR vs SCHD

📍 SCHD pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodSPRSCHD
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, SPR + SCHD cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
SPR pays
SCHD pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

SPR
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$430.38/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$0.44/yr
SCHD
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$294.40/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$362.06/yr
At 15% tax rate, SCHD beats the other by $361.62/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of SPR + SCHD for your $10,000?

SPR: 50%SCHD: 50%
100% SCHD50/50100% SPR
Portfolio after 10yr
$24.8K
Annual income
$213.23/yr
Blended yield
0.86%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on SPR right now

SPR
Analyst Ratings
14
Buy
27
Hold
2
Sell
Consensus: Hold
Price Target
$46.15
+16.8% upside vs current
Range: $35.00 — $70.00
Altman Z
-1.0
Piotroski
3/9
SCHD
No analyst data
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

SPR buys
3
SCHD buys
3
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
Virginia Foxx🏢 House$SCHD▼ Sell$50,001 - $100,0002023-03-08
Steve Cohen🏢 House$SCHD▲ Buy$50,001 - $100,0002022-07-29
Ron Estes🏢 House$SPR▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002022-07-05
Ron Estes🏢 House$SPR▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002022-03-04
Hakeem S. Jeffries🏢 House$SCHD▲ Buy$15,001 - $50,0002021-04-12
Mikie Sherrill🏢 House$SCHD▲ Buy$100,001 - $250,0002020-02-21
Donna Shalala🏢 House$SPR▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002019-06-04
Donna Shalala🏢 House$SPR▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002019-02-20
Donna Shalala🏢 House$SPR▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002019-02-06
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricSPRSCHD
Forward yield5.06%3.46%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$1.06
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR-50%0%
Portfolio after 10y$20.6K$29.0K
Annual income after 10y$0.52$425.95
Total dividends collected$514.00$3.9K
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockETF

Year-by-year: SPR vs SCHD ($10,000, DRIP)

YearSPR PortfolioSPR Income/yrSCHD PortfolioSCHD Income/yrGap
1← crossover$10,953$253.16$11,226$346.36$273.00SCHD
2$11,849$129.58$12,572$357.38$723.00SCHD
3$12,744$65.50$14,046$367.84$1.3KSCHD
4$13,669$32.92$15,660$377.73$2.0KSCHD
5$14,643$16.50$17,425$387.07$2.8KSCHD
6$15,676$8.26$19,354$395.86$3.7KSCHD
7$16,778$4.13$21,461$404.13$4.7KSCHD
8$17,954$2.07$23,762$411.89$5.8KSCHD
9$19,212$1.03$26,272$419.15$7.1KSCHD
10$20,557$0.52$29,010$425.95$8.5KSCHD

SPR vs SCHD: Complete Analysis 2026

SPRStock

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures, and markets commercial aerostructures worldwide. It operates through three segments: Commercial, Defense & Space, and Aftermarket. The Commercial segment offers forward, mid, and rear fuselage sections and systems, struts/pylons, nacelles, and related engine structural components; and wings and wing components, including flight control surfaces, as well as other structural parts. This segment primarily serves the aircraft original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) or engine OEMs of large commercial aircraft and/or business/regional jet programs. The Defense & Space segment provides fuselage, strut, nacelle, and wing aerostructures primarily for U.S. Government defense programs, including Boeing P-8, C40, and KC-46 Tanker. This segment also engages in the fabrication, bonding, assembly, testing, tooling, processing, engineering analysis, and training on fixed wing aircraft aerostructures, missiles, and hypersonics works, such as solid rocket motor throats, nozzles, re-entry vehicle thermal protections systems, forward cockpit and cabin, and fuselage work on rotorcraft aerostructures. The Aftermarket segment offers spare parts and MRO services, repairs for flight control surfaces and nacelles, radome repairs, rotable assets, engineering services, advanced composite repairs, and other repair and overhaul services. Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. has a strategic partnership with Sierra Space to enhance access to commercial space economy of the future. The company was formerly known as Mid-Western Aircraft Systems Holdings, Inc. Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. was founded in 1927 and is headquartered in Wichita, Kansas.

Full SPR Calculator →

SCHDETF

The fund’s goal is to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index.

Full SCHD Calculator →
📬

Get this SPR vs SCHD comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

SPR vs JEPISPR vs OSPR vs KOSPR vs MAINSPR vs VYMSPR vs DGROSPR vs VIGSPR vs HDV

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.