Home › Compare › UREQF vs STAG

UREQF vs STAG: Dividend Comparison 2026

UREQF yields 2000000.00% · STAG yields 3.44%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 UREQF wins by $4.879226400974806e+39M in total portfolio value
10 years
UREQF
UREQF
● Live price
2000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.879226400974806e+39M
Annual income
$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full UREQF calculator →
STAG
STAG Industrial Inc.
● Live price
3.44%
Share price
$36.06
Annual div
$1.24
5Y div CAGR
0.3%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$18.3K
Annual income
$462.70
Full STAG calculator →

Portfolio growth — UREQF vs STAG

📍 UREQF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodUREQFSTAG
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, UREQF + STAG cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan
—
Feb
—
Mar
—
Apr
—
May
—
Jun
—
Jul
—
Aug
—
Sep
—
Oct
—
Nov
—
Dec
—
UREQF pays
STAG pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

UREQF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$170,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
STAG
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$292.69/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$393.29/yr
At 15% tax rate, UREQF beats the other by $4,146,934,558,431,324,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of UREQF + STAG for your $10,000?

UREQF: 50%STAG: 50%
100% STAG50/50100% UREQF
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.439613200487403e+39M
Annual income
$2,439,373,269,665,485,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
99.99%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on STAG right now

UREQF
No analyst data
Altman Z
-5.8
Piotroski
3/9
STAG
Analyst Ratings
9
Buy
9
Hold
3
Sell
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$45.00
+24.8% upside vs current
Range: $39.00 — $59.00
Altman Z
1.2
Piotroski
5/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

UREQF buys
0
STAG buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for UREQF or STAG in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricUREQFSTAG
Forward yield2000000.00% ✓3.44%
Annual dividend / share$2.00 ✓$1.24
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%0.3% ✓
Portfolio after 10y$4.879226400974806e+39M$18.3K ✓
Annual income after 10y$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓$462.70
Total dividends collected$4.879195005460081e+39M ✓$4.0K
Payment frequencyquarterlymonthly
SectorStockREIT

Year-by-year: UREQF vs STAG ($10,000, DRIP)

YearUREQF PortfolioUREQF Income/yrSTAG PortfolioSTAG Income/yrGap
1← crossover$200,010,700$200,000,000.00$10,665$345.38+$200.00M → UREQF
2$3,738,731,768,458$3,738,517,757,009.35$11,365$358.01+$3738731.76M → UREQF
3$65,315,062,866,930,490$65,311,062,423,938,240.00$12,099$370.76+$65315062866.92M → UREQF
4$1,066,400,830,062,625,000,000$1,066,330,942,945,357,500,000.00$12,870$383.63+$1066400830062625.00M → UREQF
5$16,272,182,796,453,826,000,000,000$16,271,041,747,565,660,000,000,000.00$13,678$396.60+$16272182796453826560.00M → UREQF
6$232,054,240,113,661,900,000,000,000,000$232,036,828,878,069,680,000,000,000,000.00$14,526$409.67+$2.3205424011366188e+23M → UREQF
7$3,092,799,066,104,688,500,000,000,000,000,000$3,092,550,768,067,767,400,000,000,000,000,000.00$15,413$422.82+$3.0927990661046884e+27M → UREQF
8$38,524,105,697,352,694,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$38,520,796,402,351,967,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$16,343$436.05+$3.8524105697352695e+31M → UREQF
9$448,468,826,014,798,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$448,427,605,221,702,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$17,315$449.35+$4.484688260147987e+35M → UREQF
10$4,879,226,400,974,806,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$4,878,746,539,330,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$18,332$462.70+$4.879226400974806e+39M → UREQF

UREQF vs STAG: Complete Analysis 2026

UREQF — Stock

DevEx Resources Limited, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties in Australia. The company explores for uranium, copper, nickel, palladium, gold, diamond, and other base metals. It holds 100% interest in Nabarlek project comprising 4,700 square kilometers; and Basin Creek project, as well as holds interest in Sovereign project and Junee project. The company was formerly known as Uranium Equities Limited and changed its name to DevEx Resources Limited in November 2017. DevEx Resources Limited was incorporated in 1969 and is based in West Perth, Australia.

Full UREQF Calculator →

STAG — REIT

STAG Industrial, Inc. (NYSE: STAG) is a real estate investment trust focused on the acquisition and operation of single-tenant, industrial properties throughout the United States. By targeting this type of property, STAG has developed an investment strategy that helps investors find a powerful balance of income plus growth.

Full STAG Calculator →
📬

Get this UREQF vs STAG comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

UREQF vs SCHDUREQF vs JEPIUREQF vs OUREQF vs KOUREQF vs MAINUREQF vs PLDUREQF vs EQRUREQF vs VICI

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.