HomeCompareCFRHF vs GBDC

CFRHF vs GBDC: Dividend Comparison 2026

CFRHF yields 2.13% · GBDC yields 11.85%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 GBDC wins by $20.48M in total portfolio value
10 years
CFRHF
CFRHF
● Live price
2.13%
Share price
$178.90
Annual div
$3.80
5Y div CAGR
59.9%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$291.3K
Annual income
$157,707.32
Full CFRHF calculator →
GBDC
GBDC
● Live price
11.85%
Share price
$12.66
Annual div
$1.50
5Y div CAGR
51.1%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$20.78M
Annual income
$16,389,263.41
Full GBDC calculator →

Portfolio growth — CFRHF vs GBDC

📍 GBDC pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodCFRHFGBDC
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, CFRHF + GBDC cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
CFRHF pays
GBDC pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

CFRHF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$180.64/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$134,051.22/yr
GBDC
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$1,007.11/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$13,930,873.90/yr
At 15% tax rate, GBDC beats the other by $13,796,822.68/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of CFRHF + GBDC for your $10,000?

CFRHF: 50%GBDC: 50%
100% GBDC50/50100% CFRHF
Portfolio after 10yr
$10.53M
Annual income
$8,273,485.36/yr
Blended yield
78.55%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on GBDC right now

CFRHF
No analyst data
Altman Z
5.3
Piotroski
6/9
GBDC
Analyst Ratings
6
Buy
5
Hold
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$14.00
+10.6% upside vs current
Range: $13.00 — $15.00
Altman Z
0.6
Piotroski
6/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

CFRHF buys
0
GBDC buys
2
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002023-06-30
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002023-06-19
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002022-07-14
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002022-07-12
Teresa Leger Fernandez🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002021-01-20
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002020-02-25
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▲ Buy$15,001 - $50,0002019-05-30
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricCFRHFGBDC
Forward yield2.13%11.85%
Annual dividend / share$3.80$1.50
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR59.9%51.1%
Portfolio after 10y$291.3K$20.78M
Annual income after 10y$157,707.32$16,389,263.41
Total dividends collected$257.3K$20.36M
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockBDC

Year-by-year: CFRHF vs GBDC ($10,000, DRIP)

YearCFRHF PortfolioCFRHF Income/yrGBDC PortfolioGBDC Income/yrGap
1← crossover$11,040$339.81$12,490$1,790.28$1.4KGBDC
2$12,373$560.62$16,522$3,157.73$4.1KGBDC
3$14,178$938.97$23,578$5,898.68$9.4KGBDC
4$16,779$1,607.89$37,115$11,886.75$20.3KGBDC
5$20,797$2,843.51$66,136$26,423.57$45.3KGBDC
6$27,519$5,266.92$137,257$66,491.44$109.7KGBDC
7$39,861$10,415.16$341,734$194,868.54$301.9KGBDC
8$65,196$22,544.41$1,050,788$685,133.02$985.6KGBDC
9$124,862$55,102.90$4,099,314$2,974,971.01$3.97MGBDC
10$291,310$157,707.32$20,775,530$16,389,263.41$20.48MGBDC

CFRHF vs GBDC: Complete Analysis 2026

CFRHFStock

Compagnie Financière Richemont SA engages in the luxury goods business in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and the Americas. The company operates through Jewellery Maisons, Specialist Watchmakers, and Online Distributors segments. It designs, manufactures, and distributes jewelry products; and precision timepieces, watches, and writing instruments, as well as clothing, and leather goods and accessories. The company offers its products under the Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpels, Buccellati, A. Lange & Söhne, Baume & Mercier, IWC Schaffhausen, Jaeger LeCoultre, Panerai, Piaget, Roger Dubuis, Vacheron Constantin, Watchfinder & Co., YOOX, NET-A-PORTER, MR PORTER, The Outnet, Alaïa, Chloé, Montblanc, Peter Millar, Purdey, Serapian, TIMEVALLEE, dunhill, Delvaux, and AZ Factory brands through own boutiques and online stores. Compagnie Financière Richemont SA was incorporated in 1979 and is headquartered in Bellevue, Switzerland.

Full CFRHF Calculator →

GBDCBDC

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is a business development company and operates as an externally managed closed-end non-diversified management investment company. It invests in debt and minority equity investments in middle-market companies that are, in most cases, sponsored by private equity investors. It typically invests in diversified consumer services, automobiles, healthcare technology, insurance, health care equipment and supplies, hotels, restaurants and leisure, healthcare providers and services, IT services and specialty retails. It seeks to invest in the United States. It primarily invests in first lien traditional senior debt, first lien one stop, junior debt and equity, senior secured, one stop, unitranche, second lien, subordinated and mezzanine loans of middle-market companies, and warrants.

Full GBDC Calculator →
📬

Get this CFRHF vs GBDC comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

CFRHF vs SCHDCFRHF vs JEPICFRHF vs OCFRHF vs KOCFRHF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.