HomeCompareELMSQ vs GBDC

ELMSQ vs GBDC: Dividend Comparison 2026

ELMSQ yields 1481.48% · GBDC yields 11.85%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 ELMSQ wins by $626785540.68M in total portfolio value
10 years
ELMSQ
ELMSQ
● Live price
1481.48%
Share price
$0.14
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$626785561.46M
Annual income
$553,314,905,198,340.25
Full ELMSQ calculator →
GBDC
GBDC
● Live price
11.85%
Share price
$12.66
Annual div
$1.50
5Y div CAGR
51.1%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$20.78M
Annual income
$16,389,263.41
Full GBDC calculator →

Portfolio growth — ELMSQ vs GBDC

📍 ELMSQ pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodELMSQGBDC
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, ELMSQ + GBDC cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
ELMSQ pays
GBDC pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

ELMSQ
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$125,925.93/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$470,317,669,418,589.20/yr
GBDC
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$1,007.11/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$13,930,873.90/yr
At 15% tax rate, ELMSQ beats the other by $470,317,655,487,715.30/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of ELMSQ + GBDC for your $10,000?

ELMSQ: 50%GBDC: 50%
100% GBDC50/50100% ELMSQ
Portfolio after 10yr
$313392791.12M
Annual income
$276,657,460,793,801.80/yr
Blended yield
88.28%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on GBDC right now

ELMSQ
Analyst Ratings
5
Hold
Consensus: Hold
Altman Z
0.0
Piotroski
0/9
GBDC
Analyst Ratings
6
Buy
5
Hold
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$14.00
+10.6% upside vs current
Range: $13.00 — $15.00
Altman Z
0.6
Piotroski
6/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

ELMSQ buys
0
GBDC buys
2
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002023-06-30
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002023-06-19
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002022-07-14
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002022-07-12
Teresa Leger Fernandez🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002021-01-20
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002020-02-25
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▲ Buy$15,001 - $50,0002019-05-30
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricELMSQGBDC
Forward yield1481.48%11.85%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$1.50
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%51.1%
Portfolio after 10y$626785561.46M$20.78M
Annual income after 10y$553,314,905,198,340.25$16,389,263.41
Total dividends collected$621430185.90M$20.36M
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockBDC
Analyst consensusHoldBuy

Year-by-year: ELMSQ vs GBDC ($10,000, DRIP)

YearELMSQ PortfolioELMSQ Income/yrGBDC PortfolioGBDC Income/yrGap
1← crossover$158,848$148,148.15$12,490$1,790.28+$146.4KELMSQ
2$2,369,319$2,199,351.31$16,522$3,157.73+$2.35MELMSQ
3$33,193,761$30,658,589.95$23,578$5,898.68+$33.17MELMSQ
4$436,939,498$401,422,173.47$37,115$11,886.75+$436.90MELMSQ
5$5,405,881,572$4,938,356,308.99$66,136$26,423.57+$5405.82MELMSQ
6$62,885,313,260$57,101,019,978.27$137,257$66,491.44+$62885.18MELMSQ
7$688,074,536,789$620,787,251,600.62$341,734$194,868.54+$688074.20MELMSQ
8$7,084,361,831,143$6,348,122,076,778.87$1,050,788$685,133.02+$7084360.78MELMSQ
9$68,664,164,726,111$61,083,897,566,788.09$4,099,314$2,974,971.01+$68664160.63MELMSQ
10$626,785,561,455,279$553,314,905,198,340.25$20,775,530$16,389,263.41+$626785540.68MELMSQ

ELMSQ vs GBDC: Complete Analysis 2026

ELMSQStock

Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc., a commercial electric vehicle solutions company, focuses on designing, engineering, manufacturing, and customizing electric 'last mile' delivery and utility vehicles. It offers Class 1 commercial electric vehicle in the U.S. market and focuses on producing Class 3 Urban Utility electric vehicle. The company is headquartered in Troy, Michigan. On June 14, 2022, Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc., along with its affiliate, filed a voluntary petition for liquidation under Chapter 7 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.

Full ELMSQ Calculator →

GBDCBDC

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is a business development company and operates as an externally managed closed-end non-diversified management investment company. It invests in debt and minority equity investments in middle-market companies that are, in most cases, sponsored by private equity investors. It typically invests in diversified consumer services, automobiles, healthcare technology, insurance, health care equipment and supplies, hotels, restaurants and leisure, healthcare providers and services, IT services and specialty retails. It seeks to invest in the United States. It primarily invests in first lien traditional senior debt, first lien one stop, junior debt and equity, senior secured, one stop, unitranche, second lien, subordinated and mezzanine loans of middle-market companies, and warrants.

Full GBDC Calculator →
📬

Get this ELMSQ vs GBDC comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

ELMSQ vs SCHDELMSQ vs JEPIELMSQ vs OELMSQ vs KOELMSQ vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.