Home › Compare › LRDG vs BTI

LRDG vs BTI: Dividend Comparison 2026

LRDG yields 1000000.00% · BTI yields 5.38%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 LRDG wins by $4.7683925249533696e+36M in total portfolio value
10 years
LRDG
LRDG
● Live price
1000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.7683925249533696e+36M
Annual income
$4,767,454,694,456,067,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full LRDG calculator →
BTI
BTI
● Live price
5.38%
Share price
$58.47
Annual div
$3.15
5Y div CAGR
11.3%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$37.7K
Annual income
$2,786.64
Full BTI calculator →

Portfolio growth — LRDG vs BTI

📍 LRDG pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodLRDGBTI
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, LRDG + BTI cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan
—
Feb
—
Mar
—
Apr
—
May
—
Jun
—
Jul
—
Aug
—
Sep
—
Oct
—
Nov
—
Dec
—
LRDG pays
BTI pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

LRDG
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$85,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,052,336,490,287,657,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
BTI
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$457.40/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$2,368.64/yr
At 15% tax rate, LRDG beats the other by $4,052,336,490,287,657,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of LRDG + BTI for your $10,000?

LRDG: 50%BTI: 50%
100% BTI50/50100% LRDG
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.3841962624766848e+36M
Annual income
$2,383,727,347,228,033,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
99.98%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on BTI right now

LRDG
No analyst data
Altman Z
-1494.3
Piotroski
2/9
BTI
Analyst Ratings
12
Buy
4
Hold
2
Sell
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$40.00
-31.6% upside vs current
Range: $40.00 — $40.00
Altman Z
2.1
Piotroski
7/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

LRDG buys
0
BTI buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for LRDG or BTI in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricLRDGBTI
Forward yield1000000.00% ✓5.38%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$3.15 ✓
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%11.3% ✓
Portfolio after 10y$4.7683925249533696e+36M$37.7K ✓
Annual income after 10y$4,767,454,694,456,067,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓$2,786.64
Total dividends collected$4.7683311610149396e+36M$14.3K ✓
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockConsumer Staples

Year-by-year: LRDG vs BTI ($10,000, DRIP)

YearLRDG PortfolioLRDG Income/yrBTI PortfolioBTI Income/yrGap
1← crossover$100,010,700$100,000,000.00$11,299$598.92+$100.00M → LRDG
2$934,786,450,701$934,679,439,252.34$12,794$703.91+$934786.44M → LRDG
3$8,165,787,108,578,292$8,164,786,887,076,042.00$14,518$829.07+$8165787108.56M → LRDG
4$66,665,884,190,957,650,000$66,657,146,798,751,470,000.00$16,513$978.64+$66665884190957.63M → LRDG
5$508,662,171,058,048,100,000,000$508,590,838,561,963,700,000,000.00$18,827$1,157.84+$508662171058048128.00M → LRDG
6$3,627,235,248,428,489,700,000,000,000$3,626,690,979,905,457,600,000,000,000.00$21,518$1,373.12+$3.62723524842849e+21M → LRDG
7$24,173,681,159,150,610,000,000,000,000,000$24,169,800,017,434,790,000,000,000,000,000.00$24,657$1,632.46+$2.417368115915061e+25M → LRDG
8$150,567,402,861,454,640,000,000,000,000,000,000$150,541,537,022,614,370,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$28,329$1,945.74+$1.5056740286145463e+29M → LRDG
9$876,477,100,281,847,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$876,315,993,160,785,800,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$32,637$2,325.33+$8.764771002818475e+32M → LRDG
10$4,768,392,524,953,369,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$4,767,454,694,456,067,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$37,708$2,786.64+$4.7683925249533696e+36M → LRDG

LRDG vs BTI: Complete Analysis 2026

LRDG — Stock

Lord Global Corporation engages in the development, production, and distribution of fictional and documentary films about a creature known as Bigfoot. It offers T-shirts, decals, coffee mugs, skull caps, and ball caps. The company was formerly known as Bigfoot Project Investments Inc. and changed its name to Lord Global Corporation in January 2020. Lord Global Corporation was founded in 2011 and is based in Henderson, Nevada.

Full LRDG Calculator →

BTI — Consumer Staples

British American Tobacco p.l.c. provides tobacco and nicotine products to consumers in the Americas, Europe, the Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, and the United States. It offers vapour, heated, and modern oral nicotine products; combustible cigarettes; and traditional oral products, such as snus and moist snuff. The company provides its products under the Vuse, glo, Velo, Grizzly, Kodiak, Dunhill, Kent, Lucky Strike, Pall Mall, Rothmans, Newport, Natural American Spirit, and Camel brands. The company distributes its products to retail outlets. British American Tobacco p.l.c. was founded in 1902 and is based in London, the United Kingdom.

Full BTI Calculator →
📬

Get this LRDG vs BTI comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

LRDG vs SCHDLRDG vs JEPILRDG vs OLRDG vs KOLRDG vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.