Is NBVAF or EPRT a better dividend investment in 2026?

NBVAF currently yields 1666.67% with a 5% 5-year dividend growth rate. EPRT yields 3.92% with 5% growth. The better choice depends on your goal: NBVAF offers higher current income.

What is the dividend yield difference between NBVAF and EPRT?

NBVAF has a forward dividend yield of 1666.67% ($2.00/share annually). EPRT yields 3.92% ($1.21/share annually). The yield gap is 1662.75 percentage points.

Home › Compare › NBVAF vs EPRT

NBVAF vs EPRT: Dividend Comparison 2026

NBVAF yields 1666.67% · EPRT yields 3.92%● Live data

vsPost on X →

After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled

🏆 NBVAF wins by $1839785666.20M in total portfolio value

INVESTMENT

TIME HORIZON10 years

NBVAF

● Live price

1666.67%

Share price

$0.12

Annual div

$2.00

5Y div CAGR

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$1839785666.26M

Annual income

$1,645,561,548,268,653.00

Full NBVAF calculator →

EPRT

● Live price

3.92%

Share price

$30.77

Annual div

$1.21

5Y div CAGR

29%

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$63.4K

Annual income

$12,840.73

Full EPRT calculator →

Portfolio growth — NBVAF vs EPRT

📍 NBVAF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis Period	NBVAF	EPRT
2008–2009 GFC	— No data	— No data
2020 Q1–Q2 COVID	— No data	— No data
2022 Q4 Rate Hike	— No data	— No data

Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.

📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, NBVAF + EPRT cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan

—

Feb

—

Mar

—

Apr

—

May

—

Jun

—

Jul

—

Aug

—

Sep

—

Oct

—

Nov

—

Dec

—

NBVAF pays

EPRT pays

Both pay

Neither

💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

NBVAF

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$141,666.67/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$1,398,727,316,028,355.00/yr

EPRT

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$332.87/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$10,914.62/yr

At 15% tax rate, NBVAF beats the other by $1,398,727,316,017,440.50/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000

⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of NBVAF + EPRT for your $10,000?

NBVAF: 50%EPRT: 50%

100% EPRT50/50100% NBVAF

Portfolio after 10yr

$919892833.16M

Annual income

$822,780,774,140,746.90/yr

Blended yield

89.44%

📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on EPRT right now

NBVAF

No analyst data

Altman Z

6.3

Piotroski

1/9

EPRT

Analyst Ratings

Strong

Buy

Hold

Sell

Consensus: Buy

Price Target

$35.50

+15.4% upside vs current

Range: $33.00 — $37.00

Altman Z

1.8

Piotroski

5/9

Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.

🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

NBVAF buys

EPRT buys

No recent congressional trades found for NBVAF or EPRT in the last 90 days.

STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →

MetricNBVAFEPRT

Forward yield	1666.67% ✓	3.92%
Annual dividend / share	$2.00 ✓	$1.21
Payout ratio	50%	50%
1-year div growth	0%	0%
5-year div CAGR	0%	29% ✓
Portfolio after 10y	$1839785666.26M ✓	$63.4K
Annual income after 10y	$1,645,561,548,268,653.00 ✓	$12,840.73
Total dividends collected	$1825787439.21M ✓	$37.9K
Payment frequency	quarterly	quarterly
Sector	Stock	REIT

Year-by-year: NBVAF vs EPRT ($10,000, DRIP)

Year	NBVAF Portfolio	NBVAF Income/yr	EPRT Portfolio	EPRT Income/yr	Gap
1← crossover	$177,367	$166,666.67	$11,205	$505.18	+$166.2K → NBVAF
2	$2,952,503	$2,762,720.66	$12,672	$682.46	+$2.94M → NBVAF
3	$46,139,686	$42,980,507.73	$14,490	$930.48	+$46.13M → NBVAF
4	$677,098,258	$627,728,794.51	$16,786	$1,282.69	+$677.08M → NBVAF
5	$9,333,745,461	$8,609,250,324.41	$19,753	$1,791.56	+$9333.73M → NBVAF
6	$120,900,966,251	$110,913,858,608.07	$23,677	$2,541.64	+$120900.94M → NBVAF
7	$1,472,054,345,780	$1,342,690,311,890.92	$29,008	$3,672.99	+$1472054.32M → NBVAF
8	$16,853,789,214,559	$15,278,691,064,574.45	$36,463	$5,425.08	+$16853789.18M → NBVAF
9	$181,517,867,281,133	$163,484,312,821,554.84	$47,238	$8,221.57	+$181517867.23M → NBVAF
10	$1,839,785,666,259,465	$1,645,561,548,268,653.00	$63,385	$12,840.73	+$1839785666.20M → NBVAF

NBVAF vs EPRT: Complete Analysis 2026

NBVAF — Stock

Nubeva Technologies Ltd. develops and licenses proprietary software for the decryption of network traffic. It engages in the provision of cloud-based security software and services, as well as professional services. The company was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Full NBVAF Calculator →

EPRT — REIT

Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc., a real estate company, acquires, owns, and manages single-tenant properties in the United States. The company leases its properties to middle-market companies, such as restaurants, car washes, automotive services, medical and dental services, convenience stores, equipment rental, entertainment, early childhood education, grocery, and health and fitness on a long-term basis. As of December 31, 2021, it had a portfolio of 1, 451 properties. The company qualifies as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes. It generally would not be subject to federal corporate income taxes if it distributes at least 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders. The company was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey.

Full EPRT Calculator →

📬

Get this NBVAF vs EPRT comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

NBVAF vs SCHD NBVAF vs JEPI NBVAF vs O NBVAF vs KO NBVAF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.