HomeCompareNHAWF vs GBDC

NHAWF vs GBDC: Dividend Comparison 2026

NHAWF yields 843.88% · GBDC yields 11.85%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 NHAWF wins by $4363228.02M in total portfolio value
10 years
NHAWF
NHAWF
● Live price
843.88%
Share price
$0.24
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4363248.80M
Annual income
$3,538,417,394,347.70
Full NHAWF calculator →
GBDC
GBDC
● Live price
11.85%
Share price
$12.66
Annual div
$1.50
5Y div CAGR
51.1%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$20.78M
Annual income
$16,389,263.41
Full GBDC calculator →

Portfolio growth — NHAWF vs GBDC

📍 NHAWF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodNHAWFGBDC
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, NHAWF + GBDC cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
NHAWF pays
GBDC pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

NHAWF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$71,729.96/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$3,007,654,785,195.55/yr
GBDC
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$1,007.11/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$13,930,873.90/yr
At 15% tax rate, NHAWF beats the other by $3,007,640,854,321.65/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of NHAWF + GBDC for your $10,000?

NHAWF: 50%GBDC: 50%
100% GBDC50/50100% NHAWF
Portfolio after 10yr
$2181634.79M
Annual income
$1,769,216,891,805.55/yr
Blended yield
81.10%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on GBDC right now

NHAWF
No analyst data
Altman Z
18.6
Piotroski
2/9
GBDC
Analyst Ratings
6
Buy
5
Hold
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$14.00
+10.6% upside vs current
Range: $13.00 — $15.00
Altman Z
0.6
Piotroski
6/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

NHAWF buys
0
GBDC buys
2
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002023-06-30
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002023-06-19
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002022-07-14
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002022-07-12
Teresa Leger Fernandez🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002021-01-20
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002020-02-25
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▲ Buy$15,001 - $50,0002019-05-30
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricNHAWFGBDC
Forward yield843.88%11.85%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$1.50
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%51.1%
Portfolio after 10y$4363248.80M$20.78M
Annual income after 10y$3,538,417,394,347.70$16,389,263.41
Total dividends collected$4298592.53M$20.36M
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockBDC

Year-by-year: NHAWF vs GBDC ($10,000, DRIP)

YearNHAWF PortfolioNHAWF Income/yrGBDC PortfolioGBDC Income/yrGap
1← crossover$95,088$84,388.19$12,490$1,790.28+$82.6KNHAWF
2$851,681$749,936.40$16,522$3,157.73+$835.2KNHAWF
3$7,188,859$6,277,560.82$23,578$5,898.68+$7.17MNHAWF
4$57,213,181$49,521,101.51$37,115$11,886.75+$57.18MNHAWF
5$429,552,802$368,334,698.45$66,136$26,423.57+$429.49MNHAWF
6$3,044,138,048$2,584,516,550.07$137,257$66,491.44+$3044.00MNHAWF
7$20,374,845,574$17,117,617,861.98$341,734$194,868.54+$20374.50MNHAWF
8$128,876,441,910$107,075,357,146.57$1,050,788$685,133.02+$128875.39MNHAWF
9$770,870,472,639$632,972,679,795.13$4,099,314$2,974,971.01+$770866.37MNHAWF
10$4,363,248,800,072$3,538,417,394,347.70$20,775,530$16,389,263.41+$4363228.02MNHAWF

NHAWF vs GBDC: Complete Analysis 2026

NHAWFStock

North Arrow Minerals Inc. engages in the acquisition and exploration of diamond properties in Canada. The company's principal properties include Naujaat and Mel projects located in Nunavut; the Pikoo project comprises 39,752 hectares of mineral claims located in Saskatchewan; and the Loki Diamond property, including 23 mineral claims that covers approximately 12,898 hectares located in Northwest Territories. It also owns a 100% interest in ORO gold property located in the Hope Bay Volcanic Belt in Nunavut; the Luxx property located in Nunavut; and the CSI property, which comprises 4,540 hectares located in the Nunavut. North Arrow Minerals Inc. is based in Vancouver, Canada.

Full NHAWF Calculator →

GBDCBDC

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is a business development company and operates as an externally managed closed-end non-diversified management investment company. It invests in debt and minority equity investments in middle-market companies that are, in most cases, sponsored by private equity investors. It typically invests in diversified consumer services, automobiles, healthcare technology, insurance, health care equipment and supplies, hotels, restaurants and leisure, healthcare providers and services, IT services and specialty retails. It seeks to invest in the United States. It primarily invests in first lien traditional senior debt, first lien one stop, junior debt and equity, senior secured, one stop, unitranche, second lien, subordinated and mezzanine loans of middle-market companies, and warrants.

Full GBDC Calculator →
📬

Get this NHAWF vs GBDC comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

NHAWF vs SCHDNHAWF vs JEPINHAWF vs ONHAWF vs KONHAWF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.