Is RRSSF or BTI a better dividend investment in 2026?

RRSSF currently yields 3333.33% with a 5% 5-year dividend growth rate. BTI yields 5.40% with 5% growth. The better choice depends on your goal: RRSSF offers higher current income.

What is the dividend yield difference between RRSSF and BTI?

RRSSF has a forward dividend yield of 3333.33% ($2.00/share annually). BTI yields 5.40% ($3.15/share annually). The yield gap is 3327.93 percentage points.

Home › Compare › RRSSF vs BTI

RRSSF vs BTI: Dividend Comparison 2026

RRSSF yields 3333.33% · BTI yields 5.40%● Live data

vsPost on X →

After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled

🏆 RRSSF wins by $95.00M in total portfolio value

INVESTMENT

TIME HORIZON10 years

RRSSF

● Live price

3333.33%

Share price

$0.06

Annual div

$2.00

5Y div CAGR

-50%

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$95.04M

Annual income

$1,547,071.13

Full RRSSF calculator →

BTI

● Live price

5.40%

Share price

$58.26

Annual div

$3.15

5Y div CAGR

11.3%

Payout ratio

50%

After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP

Portfolio value

$37.8K

Annual income

$2,802.29

Full BTI calculator →

Portfolio growth — RRSSF vs BTI

📍 RRSSF pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis Period	RRSSF	BTI
2008–2009 GFC	— No data	— No data
2020 Q1–Q2 COVID	— No data	— No data
2022 Q4 Rate Hike	— No data	— No data

Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.

📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, RRSSF + BTI cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan

—

Feb

—

Mar

—

Apr

—

May

—

Jun

—

Jul

—

Aug

—

Sep

—

Oct

—

Nov

—

Dec

—

RRSSF pays

BTI pays

Both pay

Neither

💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

RRSSF

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$283,333.33/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$1,315,010.46/yr

BTI

Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)

$459.05/yr

After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)

$2,381.95/yr

At 15% tax rate, RRSSF beats the other by $1,312,628.51/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000

⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of RRSSF + BTI for your $10,000?

RRSSF: 50%BTI: 50%

100% BTI50/50100% RRSSF

Portfolio after 10yr

$47.54M

Annual income

$774,936.70/yr

Blended yield

1.63%

📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on BTI right now

RRSSF

No analyst data

Altman Z

-0.9

Piotroski

1/9

BTI

Analyst Ratings

Buy

Hold

Sell

Consensus: Buy

Price Target

$40.00

-31.3% upside vs current

Range: $40.00 — $40.00

Altman Z

2.1

Piotroski

7/9

Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.

🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

RRSSF buys

BTI buys

No recent congressional trades found for RRSSF or BTI in the last 90 days.

STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →

MetricRRSSFBTI

Forward yield	3333.33% ✓	5.40%
Annual dividend / share	$2.00	$3.15 ✓
Payout ratio	50%	50%
1-year div growth	0%	0%
5-year div CAGR	-50%	11.3% ✓
Portfolio after 10y	$95.04M ✓	$37.8K
Annual income after 10y	$1,547,071.13 ✓	$2,802.29
Total dividends collected	$69.99M ✓	$14.4K
Payment frequency	quarterly	quarterly
Sector	Stock	Consumer Staples

Year-by-year: RRSSF vs BTI ($10,000, DRIP)

Year	RRSSF Portfolio	RRSSF Income/yr	BTI Portfolio	BTI Income/yr	Gap
1← crossover	$177,367	$166,666.67	$11,301	$601.08	+$166.1K → RRSSF
2	$1,571,143	$1,381,360.33	$12,799	$706.58	+$1.56M → RRSSF
3	$7,399,026	$5,717,903.55	$14,527	$832.38	+$7.38M → RRSSF
4	$20,499,894	$12,582,936.21	$16,527	$982.75	+$20.48M → RRSSF
5	$38,225,794	$16,290,907.46	$18,846	$1,162.95	+$38.21M → RRSSF
6	$55,096,633	$14,195,032.83	$21,545	$1,379.49	+$55.08M → RRSSF
7	$68,514,130	$9,560,732.50	$24,694	$1,640.41	+$68.49M → RRSSF
8	$78,865,738	$5,555,619.33	$28,378	$1,955.69	+$78.84M → RRSSF
9	$87,374,658	$2,988,318.85	$32,702	$2,337.79	+$87.34M → RRSSF
10	$95,037,956	$1,547,071.13	$37,794	$2,802.29	+$95.00M → RRSSF

RRSSF vs BTI: Complete Analysis 2026

RRSSF — Stock

Neometals Ltd explores for mineral projects in Australia. The company operates through three segments: Lithium, Titanium/Vanadium, and Other. Its projects include the Lithium-ion Battery Recycling project, which recovers cobalt and other materials from spent and scrap lithium batteries; Vanadium Recovery project, which recovers vanadium pentoxide through processing of steelmaking by-products; Lithium Refinery project; and Barrambie Titanium and Vanadium project located in Western Australia. The company was formerly known as Reed Resources Ltd. and changed its name to Neometals Ltd in December 2014. Neometals Ltd was incorporated in 2001 and is based in West Perth, Australia.

Full RRSSF Calculator →

BTI — Consumer Staples

British American Tobacco p.l.c. provides tobacco and nicotine products to consumers in the Americas, Europe, the Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, and the United States. It offers vapour, heated, and modern oral nicotine products; combustible cigarettes; and traditional oral products, such as snus and moist snuff. The company provides its products under the Vuse, glo, Velo, Grizzly, Kodiak, Dunhill, Kent, Lucky Strike, Pall Mall, Rothmans, Newport, Natural American Spirit, and Camel brands. The company distributes its products to retail outlets. British American Tobacco p.l.c. was founded in 1902 and is based in London, the United Kingdom.

Full BTI Calculator →

📬

Get this RRSSF vs BTI comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

RRSSF vs SCHD RRSSF vs JEPI RRSSF vs O RRSSF vs KO RRSSF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.