HomeCompareSGSVF vs GBDC

SGSVF vs GBDC: Dividend Comparison 2026

SGSVF yields 126.58% · GBDC yields 11.85%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 GBDC wins by $9.85M in total portfolio value· pulled ahead in Year 10
10 years
SGSVF
SGSVF
● Live price
126.58%
Share price
$1.58
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$10.92M
Annual income
$4,277,226.54
Full SGSVF calculator →
GBDC
GBDC
● Live price
11.85%
Share price
$12.66
Annual div
$1.50
5Y div CAGR
51.1%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$20.78M
Annual income
$16,389,263.41
Full GBDC calculator →

Portfolio growth — SGSVF vs GBDC

📍 GBDC pulled ahead of the other in Year 10

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodSGSVFGBDC
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, SGSVF + GBDC cover 0 of 12 monthsgood coverage

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
SGSVF pays
GBDC pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

SGSVF
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$10,759.49/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$3,635,642.56/yr
GBDC
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$1,007.11/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$13,930,873.90/yr
At 15% tax rate, GBDC beats the other by $10,295,231.34/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of SGSVF + GBDC for your $10,000?

SGSVF: 50%GBDC: 50%
100% GBDC50/50100% SGSVF
Portfolio after 10yr
$15.85M
Annual income
$10,333,244.97/yr
Blended yield
65.19%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on GBDC right now

SGSVF
Analyst Ratings
1
Buy
Consensus: Buy
GBDC
Analyst Ratings
6
Buy
5
Hold
Consensus: Buy
Price Target
$14.00
+10.6% upside vs current
Range: $13.00 — $15.00
Altman Z
0.6
Piotroski
6/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

SGSVF buys
0
GBDC buys
2
PoliticianChamberTickerTypeAmountDate
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$1,001 - $15,0002023-06-30
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002023-06-19
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002022-07-14
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002022-07-12
Teresa Leger Fernandez🏢 House$GBDC▼ Sell$15,001 - $50,0002021-01-20
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▲ Buy$1,001 - $15,0002020-02-25
David P. Joyce🏢 House$GBDC▲ Buy$15,001 - $50,0002019-05-30
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricSGSVFGBDC
Forward yield126.58%11.85%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$1.50
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%51.1%
Portfolio after 10y$10.92M$20.78M
Annual income after 10y$4,277,226.54$16,389,263.41
Total dividends collected$9.98M$20.36M
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockBDC
Analyst consensusBuyBuy

Year-by-year: SGSVF vs GBDC ($10,000, DRIP)

YearSGSVF PortfolioSGSVF Income/yrGBDC PortfolioGBDC Income/yrGap
1$23,358$12,658.23$12,490$1,790.28+$10.9KSGSVF
2$52,626$27,633.06$16,522$3,157.73+$36.1KSGSVF
3$114,495$58,184.69$23,578$5,898.68+$90.9KSGSVF
4$240,816$118,306.26$37,115$11,886.75+$203.7KSGSVF
5$490,226$232,553.45$66,136$26,423.57+$424.1KSGSVF
6$966,978$442,436.24$137,257$66,491.44+$829.7KSGSVF
7$1,850,285$815,618.44$341,734$194,868.54+$1.51MSGSVF
8$3,438,368$1,458,562.97$1,050,788$685,133.02+$2.39MSGSVF
9$6,212,170$2,533,116.04$4,099,314$2,974,971.01+$2.11MSGSVF
10← crossover$10,924,249$4,277,226.54$20,775,530$16,389,263.41$9.85MGBDC

SGSVF vs GBDC: Complete Analysis 2026

SGSVFStock

Sabina Gold & Silver Corp., a precious metals company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral resource properties in Canada. The company primarily explores for gold and silver deposit. Its flagship projects include Back River gold project comprising Goose, George, Boulder, Boot, Del, and Bath properties, as well as the port facility at Bathurst Inlet that covers an area of approximately 564 square kilometers located in Nunavut, Canada; and silver royalty on the Hackett River project that covers an area of approximately 10,637 hectares located in Nunavut, Canada. The company was formerly known as Sabina Silver Corporation and changed its name to Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. in October 2009. Sabina Gold & Silver Corp. was incorporated in 1966 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Full SGSVF Calculator →

GBDCBDC

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is a business development company and operates as an externally managed closed-end non-diversified management investment company. It invests in debt and minority equity investments in middle-market companies that are, in most cases, sponsored by private equity investors. It typically invests in diversified consumer services, automobiles, healthcare technology, insurance, health care equipment and supplies, hotels, restaurants and leisure, healthcare providers and services, IT services and specialty retails. It seeks to invest in the United States. It primarily invests in first lien traditional senior debt, first lien one stop, junior debt and equity, senior secured, one stop, unitranche, second lien, subordinated and mezzanine loans of middle-market companies, and warrants.

Full GBDC Calculator →
📬

Get this SGSVF vs GBDC comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

SGSVF vs SCHDSGSVF vs JEPISGSVF vs OSGSVF vs KOSGSVF vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.