Home › Compare › TBEV vs EQR

TBEV vs EQR: Dividend Comparison 2026

TBEV yields 10000000.00% · EQR yields 5.87%● Live data

vsPost on X →
After 10 years · $10,000 invested · DRIP enabled
🏆 TBEV wins by $4.762052817831319e+46M in total portfolio value
10 years
TBEV
TBEV
● Live price
10000000.00%
Share price
$0.00
Annual div
$2.00
5Y div CAGR
0%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$4.762052817831319e+46M
Annual income
$47,619,591,428,874,056,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00
Full TBEV calculator →
EQR
EQR
● Live price
5.87%
Share price
$59.15
Annual div
$3.47
5Y div CAGR
15.8%
Payout ratio
50%
After 10 yrs · $10,000 · DRIP
Portfolio value
$47.8K
Annual income
$5,475.61
Full EQR calculator →

Portfolio growth — TBEV vs EQR

📍 TBEV pulled ahead of the other in Year 1

Annual dividend income

🛡️

Recession Test — Did They Cut Dividends?

How each stock treated shareholders during the 3 biggest crises of the last 20 years

Crisis PeriodTBEVEQR
2008–2009
GFC
— No data— No data
2020 Q1–Q2
COVID
— No data— No data
2022 Q4
Rate Hike
— No data— No data
Based on dividend payment history. "Increased" = dividend grew during crisis. "Maintained" = held within 3%. "Cut" = reduced by more than 3%.
📅

Dividend Calendar Overlap

Combined, TBEV + EQR cover 0 of 12 months — good coverage

Jan
—
Feb
—
Mar
—
Apr
—
May
—
Jun
—
Jul
—
Aug
—
Sep
—
Oct
—
Nov
—
Dec
—
TBEV pays
EQR pays
Both pay
Neither
💰

Tax Bracket Optimizer

Which stock is actually better after tax? Adjust your rate to find out.

TBEV
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$850,000,000.00/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$40,476,652,714,542,950,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
EQR
Annual income on $10K today (after 15% tax)
$499.01/yr
After 10yr DRIP, annual income (after tax)
$4,654.27/yr
At 15% tax rate, TBEV beats the other by $40,476,652,714,542,950,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/year in after-tax income after 10 years on $10,000
⚖️

Lazy Portfolio Split Optimizer

What's the optimal mix of TBEV + EQR for your $10,000?

TBEV: 50%EQR: 50%
100% EQR50/50100% TBEV
Portfolio after 10yr
$2.3810264089156593e+46M
Annual income
$23,809,795,714,437,028,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00/yr
Blended yield
100.00%
📊

Analyst Conviction Gap

Where Wall Street is most bullish on EQR right now

TBEV
No analyst data
Altman Z
-1783.1
Piotroski
2/9
EQR
Analyst Ratings
16
Buy
28
Hold
2
Sell
Consensus: Hold
Price Target
$70.35
+18.9% upside vs current
Range: $63.00 — $78.50
Altman Z
1.8
Piotroski
7/9
Analyst ratings via FMP. Altman Z-Score: >3.0 safe, 1.81–3.0 grey zone, <1.81 distress. Piotroski: 7–9 strong, 0–3 weak.
🏛️

Copy Congress — What Are Politicians Buying?

Senate & House STOCK Act disclosures (last 90 days)

TBEV buys
0
EQR buys
0
No recent congressional trades found for TBEV or EQR in the last 90 days.
STOCK Act mandates disclosure within 45 days of transaction. Data via FMP.Full tracker →
MetricTBEVEQR
Forward yield10000000.00% ✓5.87%
Annual dividend / share$2.00$3.47 ✓
Payout ratio50%50%
1-year div growth0%0%
5-year div CAGR0%15.8% ✓
Portfolio after 10y$4.762052817831319e+46M$47.8K ✓
Annual income after 10y$47,619,591,428,874,056,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00 ✓$5,475.61
Total dividends collected$4.762046689458665e+46M$23.0K ✓
Payment frequencyquarterlyquarterly
SectorStockREIT

Year-by-year: TBEV vs EQR ($10,000, DRIP)

YearTBEV PortfolioTBEV Income/yrEQR PortfolioEQR Income/yrGap
1← crossover$1,000,010,700$1,000,000,000.00$11,380$679.82+$1000.00M → TBEV
2$93,460,013,936,683$93,458,943,925,233.62$13,014$837.25+$93460013.92M → TBEV
3$8,163,259,573,940,183,000$8,163,159,571,725,270,000.00$14,961$1,036.20+$8163259573940.17M → TBEV
4$666,373,880,559,373,300,000,000$666,365,145,871,629,100,000,000.00$17,297$1,289.22+$666373880559373312.00M → TBEV
5$50,838,057,311,279,720,000,000,000,000$50,837,344,291,227,520,000,000,000,000.00$20,121$1,613.15+$5.083805731127972e+22M → TBEV
6$3,624,737,622,195,432,400,000,000,000,000,000$3,624,683,225,474,109,500,000,000,000,000,000.00$23,561$2,030.84+$3.6247376221954326e+27M → TBEV
7$241,535,451,261,763,920,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$241,531,572,792,508,160,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$27,783$2,573.54+$2.4153545126176394e+32M → TBEV
8$15,041,872,435,857,020,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$15,041,613,992,924,168,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$33,013$3,284.39+$1.504187243585702e+37M → TBEV
9$875,466,765,540,973,800,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$875,450,670,737,467,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$39,547$4,223.51+$8.754667655409739e+41M → TBEV
10$47,620,528,178,313,184,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000$47,619,591,428,874,056,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00$47,791$5,475.61+$4.762052817831319e+46M → TBEV

TBEV vs EQR: Complete Analysis 2026

TBEV — Stock

High Performance Beverages Company develops, manufactures, distributes, markets, and sells sports performance drinks in the United States and Canada. The company was formerly known as Dethrone Royalty Holdings, Inc. and changed its name to High Performance Beverages Company in November 2013. High Performance Beverages Company was founded in 1997 and is based in Cave Creek, Arizona.

Full TBEV Calculator →

EQR — REIT

Equity Residential is committed to creating communities where people thrive. The Company, a member of the S&P 500, is focused on the acquisition, development and management of residential properties located in and around dynamic cities that attract high quality long-term renters. Equity Residential owns or has investments in 305 properties consisting of 78,568 apartment units, located in Boston, New York, Washington, D.C., Seattle, San Francisco, Southern California and Denver.

Full EQR Calculator →
📬

Get this TBEV vs EQR comparison by email

Save your analysis + weekly dividend insights. Free forever.

More comparisons

TBEV vs SCHDTBEV vs JEPITBEV vs OTBEV vs KOTBEV vs MAIN

⚠️ Educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Congressional trades sourced from SEC STOCK Act filings via FMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.